Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2021.09.004
Title: Aerosol-generating dental procedures: a reappraisal of analysis methods and infection control measures
Authors: Tan Kai Soo 
CHEW REN JIE, JACOB (ZHOU RENJIE) 
Allen Patrick Finbarr 
Soo Hoon, Victoria Yu 
Keywords: Infection control
Dentistry
Aerosols
Communicable diseases
Disinfectants
Nosocomial infections
Issue Date: Nov-2021
Publisher: Elsevier Ltd
Citation: Tan Kai Soo, CHEW REN JIE, JACOB (ZHOU RENJIE), Allen Patrick Finbarr, Soo Hoon, Victoria Yu (2021-11). Aerosol-generating dental procedures: a reappraisal of analysis methods and infection control measures. Journal of Hospital Infection 117 : 81-88. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2021.09.004
Abstract: Background: Dental aerosol generating procedures (AGPs) have been associated with risk for transmitting infectious agents. However, existing infection control monitoring studies potentially underestimate the extent of contamination, due to methodological inadequacies. These studies employed settle plate methodology which only captures droplets that land on agar plates, but not those suspended in air. Furthermore, bacterial culture was used to determine the extent of contamination, without accounting for non-bacterial sources of contamination. Aims: This study seeks to bridge these gaps by establishing a monitoring protocol involving active aerosol sampling and analysis of two dental AGPs, root canal treatment (RCT) and scaling. Methods: RCT and scaling were performed with standard aerosol mitigation precautions. Aerosols generated throughout each procedure were sampled using the air sampler device, while contamination of operatory fomites and personal protective equipment was sampled using surface swabs, before and post-treatment. The amount of contamination was quantified using bacterial culture and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) assay. Findings: RCT generated insignificant aerosol and splatter, supporting the infection control procedures’ effectiveness. Conversely, scaling significantly increased the amount of aerosol and splatter. When comparing bacterial culture and ATP assay, the magnitude of contamination obtained with ATP assay was greater, suggesting that ATP assay may have detected additional contamination of human origin and bacteria that was not recovered by the culture conditions employed. Conclusions: This monitoring protocol is feasible in the dental setting and determines the extent of contamination generated during AGPs. This can be adopted in future studies to overcome the limitations of the existing literature. Keywords: infection control, dentistry, aerosols, communicable diseases, disinfectants, nosocomial infections
Source Title: Journal of Hospital Infection
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/236179
ISSN: 0195-6701
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2021.09.004
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
AGP Hospital infection.pdf394.22 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.