Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2021.09.004
DC FieldValue
dc.titleAerosol-generating dental procedures: a reappraisal of analysis methods and infection control measures
dc.contributor.authorTan Kai Soo
dc.contributor.authorCHEW REN JIE, JACOB (ZHOU RENJIE)
dc.contributor.authorAllen Patrick Finbarr
dc.contributor.authorSoo Hoon, Victoria Yu
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-17T03:37:52Z
dc.date.available2023-01-17T03:37:52Z
dc.date.issued2021-11
dc.identifier.citationTan Kai Soo, CHEW REN JIE, JACOB (ZHOU RENJIE), Allen Patrick Finbarr, Soo Hoon, Victoria Yu (2021-11). Aerosol-generating dental procedures: a reappraisal of analysis methods and infection control measures. Journal of Hospital Infection 117 : 81-88. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2021.09.004
dc.identifier.issn0195-6701
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/236179
dc.description.abstractBackground: Dental aerosol generating procedures (AGPs) have been associated with risk for transmitting infectious agents. However, existing infection control monitoring studies potentially underestimate the extent of contamination, due to methodological inadequacies. These studies employed settle plate methodology which only captures droplets that land on agar plates, but not those suspended in air. Furthermore, bacterial culture was used to determine the extent of contamination, without accounting for non-bacterial sources of contamination. Aims: This study seeks to bridge these gaps by establishing a monitoring protocol involving active aerosol sampling and analysis of two dental AGPs, root canal treatment (RCT) and scaling. Methods: RCT and scaling were performed with standard aerosol mitigation precautions. Aerosols generated throughout each procedure were sampled using the air sampler device, while contamination of operatory fomites and personal protective equipment was sampled using surface swabs, before and post-treatment. The amount of contamination was quantified using bacterial culture and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) assay. Findings: RCT generated insignificant aerosol and splatter, supporting the infection control procedures’ effectiveness. Conversely, scaling significantly increased the amount of aerosol and splatter. When comparing bacterial culture and ATP assay, the magnitude of contamination obtained with ATP assay was greater, suggesting that ATP assay may have detected additional contamination of human origin and bacteria that was not recovered by the culture conditions employed. Conclusions: This monitoring protocol is feasible in the dental setting and determines the extent of contamination generated during AGPs. This can be adopted in future studies to overcome the limitations of the existing literature. Keywords: infection control, dentistry, aerosols, communicable diseases, disinfectants, nosocomial infections
dc.description.urihttps://www.journalofhospitalinfection.com/article/S0195-6701(21)00317-0/fulltext
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd
dc.subjectInfection control
dc.subjectDentistry
dc.subjectAerosols
dc.subjectCommunicable diseases
dc.subjectDisinfectants
dc.subjectNosocomial infections
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentDEAN'S OFFICE (DENTISTRY)
dc.contributor.departmentDENTISTRY
dc.description.doi10.1016/j.jhin.2021.09.004
dc.description.sourcetitleJournal of Hospital Infection
dc.description.volume117
dc.description.page81-88
dc.published.statePublished
dc.grant.idR221-000-147- 651
dc.grant.fundingagencyNational University of Singapore
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
AGP Hospital infection.pdf394.22 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.