Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtocrr.2023.100599
Title: Brief Report: Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction Versus Plasma Next-Generation Sequencing in Detecting Clearance of Plasma EGFR Mutations and Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels as a Surrogate Measure
Authors: Saw, Stephanie PL 
San Tan, Gek 
Tan, Wei Chong
Tan, Aaron C 
Lai, Gillianne GY 
Lim, Darren WT 
Kanesvaran, Ravindran 
Tan, Wan Ling 
Tan, Sze Huey 
Lim, Kiat Hon 
Skanderup, Anders J 
Tan, Daniel SW 
Keywords: Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Oncology
Respiratory System
EGFR-mutated NSCLC
ddPCR
NGS
CEA
Issue Date: Dec-2023
Publisher: ELSEVIER
Citation: Saw, Stephanie PL, San Tan, Gek, Tan, Wei Chong, Tan, Aaron C, Lai, Gillianne GY, Lim, Darren WT, Kanesvaran, Ravindran, Tan, Wan Ling, Tan, Sze Huey, Lim, Kiat Hon, Skanderup, Anders J, Tan, Daniel SW (2023-12). Brief Report: Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction Versus Plasma Next-Generation Sequencing in Detecting Clearance of Plasma EGFR Mutations and Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels as a Surrogate Measure 4 (12). ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtocrr.2023.100599
Abstract: Introduction: To compare the performance of droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) and plasma next-generation sequencing (NGS) in detecting clearance of plasma EGFR (pEGFR) mutations. Methods: Patients with treatment-naive advanced EGFR-mutated lung cancer treated with first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) were included. pEGFR were measured at baseline and first response assessment using ddPCR and NGS. Clearance of pEGFR was defined as undetectable levels after a positive baseline result. Results were correlated with time-to-treatment failure (TTF). In exploratory analysis, corresponding change in carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels was evaluated. Results: Between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2021, 27 patients were recruited. Ex19del comprised 74% (20 of 27) and L858R 26% (seven of 27). Osimertinib was used in 59% (16 of 27), dacomitinib 4% (one of 27), and gefitinib/erlotinib 37% (10 of 27). Sensitivity of ddPCR and NGS in detecting pEGFR mutation at baseline was 70% (19 of 27) and 78% (21 of 27), respectively (p = 0.16). All patients with detectable pEGFR by ddPCR were detected by NGS. At a median of 8 (range 3–24) weeks post-TKI initiation, clearance of pEGFR was achieved in 68% (13 of 19) and 71% (15 of 21) using ddPCR and NGS, respectively. Concordance between ddPCR and NGS was 79% (kappa = 0.513, p = 0.013). Clearance of pEGFR was associated with longer median TTF (not reached versus 6 months, p = 0.03) and median decrease in CEA levels by 70% from baseline. In another cohort of 124 patients, decrease in CEA levels by greater than 70% within 90 days of TKI initiation was associated with doubling of both TTF and overall survival. Conclusions: Plasma NGS trended toward higher sensitivity than ddPCR in detecting pEGFR, although both had similar concordance in detecting pEGFR clearance. Our results support using NGS at diagnosis and interchangeability of NGS and ddPCR for monitoring, whereas CEA could be explored as a surrogate for pEGFR clearance.
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/248888
ISSN: 2666-3643
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2023.100599
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
Brief Report Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction Versus Plasma Next-Generation Sequencing in Detecting Clearance of Pl.pdf529.1 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.