Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13040867
Title: Targeting car to the peptide?mhc complex reveals distinct signaling compared to that of tcr in a jurkat t cell model
Authors: Wu, Ling
Brzostek, Joanna 
Sankaran, Shvetha 
Wei, Qianru 
Yap, Jiawei 
Tan, Triscilla Y. Y.
Lai, Junyun 
Macary, Paul A. 
Gascoigne, Nicholas R. J. 
Keywords: CD8 coreceptor
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell (CAR?T)
Oligomerization
Signal transduction
Signaling kinetics
T cell receptor
Issue Date: 18-Feb-2021
Publisher: MDPI AG
Citation: Wu, Ling, Brzostek, Joanna, Sankaran, Shvetha, Wei, Qianru, Yap, Jiawei, Tan, Triscilla Y. Y., Lai, Junyun, Macary, Paul A., Gascoigne, Nicholas R. J. (2021-02-18). Targeting car to the peptide?mhc complex reveals distinct signaling compared to that of tcr in a jurkat t cell model. Cancers 13 (4) : 1-13. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13040867
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: Chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR?T) utilize T cell receptor (TCR) signaling cascades and the recognition functions of antibodies. This allows T cells, normally restricted by the major histocompatibility complex (MHC), to be redirected to target cells by their surface antigens, such as tumor associated antigens (TAAs). CAR?T technology has achieved significant successes in treatment of certain cancers, primarily liquid cancers. Nonetheless, many challenges hinder development of this therapy, such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and the efficacy of CAR?T treatments for solid tumors. These challenges show our inadequate understanding of this technology, particu-larly regarding CAR signaling, which has been less studied. To dissect CAR signaling, we designed a CAR that targets an epitope from latent membrane protein 2 A (LMP2 A) of the Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) presented on HLA*A02:01. Because of this, CAR and TCR signaling can be compared directly, allowing us to study the involvement of other signaling molecules, such as coreceptors. This comparison revealed that CAR was sufficient to bind monomeric antigens due to its high affinity but required oligomeric antigens for its activation. CAR sustained the transduced signal significantly longer, but at a lower magnitude, than did TCR. CD8 coreceptor was recruited to the CAR synapse but played a negligible role in signaling, unlike for TCR signaling. The distinct CAR signaling processes could provide explanations for clinical behavior of CAR?T therapy and suggest ways to improve the technology. © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
Source Title: Cancers
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/232841
ISSN: 2072-6694
DOI: 10.3390/cancers13040867
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_3390_cancers13040867.pdf1.44 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons