Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1101986
Title: Cost benefit analysis of alternative testing and quarantine policies for travelers for infection control: A case study of Singapore during the COVID-19 pandemic
Authors: Lou, J 
Lim, NWH 
Cai, CGXT 
Dickens, BSL 
Huynh, VA 
Wee, HL 
Keywords: COVID-19
border control
cost benefit analysis
infection control
policy
quarantine
testing
travel
Humans
COVID-19
Quarantine
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Singapore
Pandemics
Issue Date: 1-Jan-2023
Publisher: Frontiers Media SA
Citation: Lou, J, Lim, NWH, Cai, CGXT, Dickens, BSL, Huynh, VA, Wee, HL (2023-01-01). Cost benefit analysis of alternative testing and quarantine policies for travelers for infection control: A case study of Singapore during the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Public Health 11 : 1101986-. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1101986
Abstract: Background: Border control mitigates local infections but bears a heavy economic cost, especially for tourism-reliant countries. While studies have supported the efficacy of border control in suppressing cross-border transmission, the trade-off between costs from imported and secondary cases and from lost economic activities has not been studied. This case study of Singapore during the COVID-19 pandemic aims to understand the impacts of varying quarantine length and testing strategies on the economy and health system. Additionally, we explored the impact of permitting unvaccinated travelers to address emerging equity concerns. We assumed that community transmission is stable and vaccination rates are high enough that inbound travelers are not dissuaded from traveling. Methods: The number of travelers was predicted considering that longer quarantine reduces willingness to travel. A micro-simulation model predicted the number of COVID-19 cases among travelers, the resultant secondary cases, and the probability of being symptomatic in each group. The incremental net monetary benefit (INB) of Singapore was quantified under each border-opening policy compared to pre-opening status, based on tourism receipts, cost/profit from testing and quarantine, and cost and health loss due to COVID-19 cases. Results: Compared to polymerase chain reaction (PCR), rapid antigen test (ART) detects fewer imported cases but results in fewer secondary cases. Longer quarantine results in fewer cases but lower INB due to reduced tourism receipts. Assuming the proportion of unvaccinated travelers is small (8% locally and 24% globally), allowing unvaccinated travelers will accrue higher INB without exceeding the intensive care unit (ICU) capacity. The highest monthly INB from all travelers is $2,236.24 m, with 46.69 ICU cases per month, achieved with ARTs at pre-departure and on arrival without quarantine. The optimal policy in terms of highest INB is robust under changes to various model assumptions. Among all cost-benefit components, the top driver for INB is tourism receipts. Conclusions: With high vaccination rates locally and globally alongside stable community transmission, opening borders to travelers regardless of vaccination status will increase economic growth in the destination country. The caseloads remain manageable without exceeding ICU capacity, and costs of cases are offset by the economic value generated from travelers.
Source Title: Frontiers in Public Health
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/242805
ISSN: 2296-2565
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1101986
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
Cost benefit analysis of alternative testing and quarantine policies for travelers for infection control A case study of Sin.pdf435.04 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

PublishedView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.