Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10040567
Title: Monitoring and Evaluation of National Vaccination Implementation: A Scoping Review of How Frameworks and Indicators Are Used in the Public Health Literature.
Authors: Marzouk, Manar
Omar, Maryam
Sirison, Kanchanok
Ananthakrishnan, Aparna
Durrance-Bagale, Anna
Pheerapanyawaranun, Chatkamol
Porncharoen, Charatpol
Pimsarn, Nopphadol
Lam, Sze Tung
Ung, Mengieng
Mougammadou Aribou, Zeenathnisa
Dabak, Saudamini V
Isaranuwatchai, Wanrudee
Howard, Natasha 
Keywords: evaluation
global health
indicators
monitoring
vaccination
Issue Date: 6-Apr-2022
Publisher: MDPI AG
Citation: Marzouk, Manar, Omar, Maryam, Sirison, Kanchanok, Ananthakrishnan, Aparna, Durrance-Bagale, Anna, Pheerapanyawaranun, Chatkamol, Porncharoen, Charatpol, Pimsarn, Nopphadol, Lam, Sze Tung, Ung, Mengieng, Mougammadou Aribou, Zeenathnisa, Dabak, Saudamini V, Isaranuwatchai, Wanrudee, Howard, Natasha (2022-04-06). Monitoring and Evaluation of National Vaccination Implementation: A Scoping Review of How Frameworks and Indicators Are Used in the Public Health Literature.. Vaccines (Basel) 10 (4) : 567-567. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10040567
Abstract: An effective Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) framework helps vaccination programme managers determine progress and effectiveness for agreed indicators against clear benchmarks and targets. We aimed to identify the literature on M&E frameworks and indicators used in national vaccination programmes and synthesise approaches and lessons to inform development of future frameworks. We conducted a scoping review using Arksey and O'Malley's six-stage framework to identify and synthesise sources on monitoring or evaluation of national vaccination implementation that described a framework or indicators. The findings were summarised thematically. We included 43 eligible sources of 4291 screened. Most (95%) were in English and discussed high-income (51%) or middle-income (30%) settings, with 13 in Europe (30%), 10 in Asia-Pacific (23%), nine in Africa (21%), and eight in the Americas (19%), respectively, while three crossed regions. Only five (12%) specified the use of an M&E framework. Most (32/43; 74%) explicitly or implicitly included vaccine coverage indicators, followed by 12 including operational (28%), five including clinical (12%), and two including cost indicators (5%). The use of M&E frameworks was seldom explicit or clearly defined in our sources, with indicators rarely fully defined or benchmarked against targets. Sources focused on ways to improve vaccination programmes without explicitly considering ways to improve assessment. Literature on M&E framework and indicator use in national vaccination programmes is limited and focused on routine childhood vaccination. Therefore, documentation of more experiences and lessons is needed to better inform vaccination M&E beyond childhood.
Source Title: Vaccines (Basel)
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/224956
ISSN: 2076393X
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10040567
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements
Students Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
2022.04.06L Marzouk-Omar VACS.pdfPublished version863.6 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

PublishedView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.