Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5594-4
Title: Does external beam radiation boost to pelvic lymph nodes improve outcomes in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer?
Authors: Wujanto, Caryn
Choo, Bok Ai 
Tan, David
Ilancheran, Arunachalam 
Ng, Joseph
Low, Jeffrey JH 
Shen, Liang 
Tang, Johann
Koh, Vicky
Keywords: Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Oncology
Cervical cancer
Radiotherapy
Pelvic node
Radiation boost
IRRADIATION
TOMOGRAPHY
CARCINOMA
Issue Date: 25-Apr-2019
Publisher: BMC
Citation: Wujanto, Caryn, Choo, Bok Ai, Tan, David, Ilancheran, Arunachalam, Ng, Joseph, Low, Jeffrey JH, Shen, Liang, Tang, Johann, Koh, Vicky (2019-04-25). Does external beam radiation boost to pelvic lymph nodes improve outcomes in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer?. BMC CANCER 19 (1). ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5594-4
Abstract: Background: Current recommendation for locally advanced cervical cancer includes pelvic external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) with concurrent chemotherapy followed by brachytherapy. Involvement of pelvic lymph nodes is an important prognostic factor in locally advanced cervical cancer and recurrence commonly occurs despite definitive treatment. To date, there is no standard guideline on whether an EBRT boost should be applied to involved pelvic lymph nodes. Our study aims to assess if pelvic EBRT boost would reduce recurrence, benefit survival, and affect associated toxicities. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of locally advanced cervical cancer cases treated with definitive treatment at our institution. Involvement of pelvic lymph nodes were assessed on CT, MRI (> 10 mm or suspicious features) or PET scan (SUVmax > 2.5). EBRT dose ranged from 45 to 50.4 Gy with nodal boost ranging from 3.6-19.8 Gy. Results: Between 2008 to 2015, 139 patients with locally advanced cervical cancer underwent treatment. Sixty-seven patients had positive pelvic lymph nodes, of which 53.7% received a nodal boost. Five-year recurrence free survival was 48.6% with vs. 64.5% without nodal boost (P = 0.169) and 5-year overall survival in those with positive pelvic lymph nodes was 74.3% with vs. 80.6% without nodal boost (P = 0.143). There was no significant difference in toxicity with nodal boost. Conclusions: EBRT boost to pelvic lymph nodes does not reduce recurrence or improve survival in locally advanced cervical cancer with lymph node involvement at diagnosis.
Source Title: BMC CANCER
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/206121
ISSN: 14712407
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5594-4
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
Does external beam radiation boost to pelvic lymph nodes improve outcomes in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.pdf748.48 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download
Does external beam radiation boost to pelvic lymph nodes improve outcomes in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.pdf748.48 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.