Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5594-4
DC FieldValue
dc.titleDoes external beam radiation boost to pelvic lymph nodes improve outcomes in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer?
dc.contributor.authorWujanto, Caryn
dc.contributor.authorChoo, Bok Ai
dc.contributor.authorTan, David
dc.contributor.authorIlancheran, Arunachalam
dc.contributor.authorNg, Joseph
dc.contributor.authorLow, Jeffrey JH
dc.contributor.authorShen, Liang
dc.contributor.authorTang, Johann
dc.contributor.authorKoh, Vicky
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-15T02:10:27Z
dc.date.available2021-11-15T02:10:27Z
dc.date.issued2019-04-25
dc.identifier.citationWujanto, Caryn, Choo, Bok Ai, Tan, David, Ilancheran, Arunachalam, Ng, Joseph, Low, Jeffrey JH, Shen, Liang, Tang, Johann, Koh, Vicky (2019-04-25). Does external beam radiation boost to pelvic lymph nodes improve outcomes in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer?. BMC CANCER 19 (1). ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5594-4
dc.identifier.issn14712407
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/206121
dc.description.abstractBackground: Current recommendation for locally advanced cervical cancer includes pelvic external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) with concurrent chemotherapy followed by brachytherapy. Involvement of pelvic lymph nodes is an important prognostic factor in locally advanced cervical cancer and recurrence commonly occurs despite definitive treatment. To date, there is no standard guideline on whether an EBRT boost should be applied to involved pelvic lymph nodes. Our study aims to assess if pelvic EBRT boost would reduce recurrence, benefit survival, and affect associated toxicities. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of locally advanced cervical cancer cases treated with definitive treatment at our institution. Involvement of pelvic lymph nodes were assessed on CT, MRI (> 10 mm or suspicious features) or PET scan (SUVmax > 2.5). EBRT dose ranged from 45 to 50.4 Gy with nodal boost ranging from 3.6-19.8 Gy. Results: Between 2008 to 2015, 139 patients with locally advanced cervical cancer underwent treatment. Sixty-seven patients had positive pelvic lymph nodes, of which 53.7% received a nodal boost. Five-year recurrence free survival was 48.6% with vs. 64.5% without nodal boost (P = 0.169) and 5-year overall survival in those with positive pelvic lymph nodes was 74.3% with vs. 80.6% without nodal boost (P = 0.143). There was no significant difference in toxicity with nodal boost. Conclusions: EBRT boost to pelvic lymph nodes does not reduce recurrence or improve survival in locally advanced cervical cancer with lymph node involvement at diagnosis.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBMC
dc.sourceElements
dc.subjectScience & Technology
dc.subjectLife Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subjectOncology
dc.subjectCervical cancer
dc.subjectRadiotherapy
dc.subjectPelvic node
dc.subjectRadiation boost
dc.subjectIRRADIATION
dc.subjectTOMOGRAPHY
dc.subjectCARCINOMA
dc.typeArticle
dc.date.updated2021-11-10T08:40:57Z
dc.contributor.departmentMEDICINE
dc.contributor.departmentOBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY
dc.contributor.departmentDEAN'S OFFICE (MEDICINE)
dc.description.doi10.1186/s12885-019-5594-4
dc.description.sourcetitleBMC CANCER
dc.description.volume19
dc.description.issue1
dc.published.statePublished
dc.description.redepositcompleted
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
Does external beam radiation boost to pelvic lymph nodes improve outcomes in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.pdf748.48 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download
Does external beam radiation boost to pelvic lymph nodes improve outcomes in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.pdf748.48 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.