Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina55080457
Title: Risk Factors for Emergency Department Unscheduled Return Visits
Authors: Crystal Harn Wei Soh
Ziwei Lin
Darius Shaw Teng Pan
Weng Hoe Ho 
Malcolm Mahadevan 
Mui Teng Chua 
Win Sen Kuan 
Issue Date: 9-Aug-2019
Publisher: MDPI AG
Citation: Crystal Harn Wei Soh, Ziwei Lin, Darius Shaw Teng Pan, Weng Hoe Ho, Malcolm Mahadevan, Mui Teng Chua, Win Sen Kuan (2019-08-09). Risk Factors for Emergency Department Unscheduled Return Visits. Medicina 55 (8) : 457-457. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina55080457
Abstract: Background and Objectives: This study aims to identify reasons for unscheduled return visits (URVs), and risk factors for diagnostic errors leading to URVs, with comparisons to data from a similar study conducted in the same institution 9 years ago. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included adult patients who attended the emergency department (ED) of a tertiary hospital in Singapore between January 2014 and June 2014, with re-attendance within 72 h for the same or similar complaint. The primary outcome was wrong or delayed diagnoses. Secondary outcomes include admission to the ED observation unit or ward on return visit. Findings were compared with the previous study performed in 2005 to identify trends. Results: Of 67,422 attendances, there were 1298 (1.93%) URVs from 1207 patients (median age 34, interquartile range 24 to 52 years; 59.7% male). The most common presenting complaint was abdominal pain (22.2%). One hundred ninety-one (15.8%) patients received an initial wrong or delayed diagnosis. Factors (adjusted odds ratio; 95% CI) associated with this were: presenting complaints of abdominal pain (2.99; 2.12–4.23), fever (1.60; 1.1–2.33), neurological deficit (4.26; 1.94–9.35), and discharge without follow-up (1.61; 1.1–2.26). Among re-attendances, 459 (38.0%) required admission. Factors (adjusted odds ratio; 95% CI) associated with admission were: male gender (1.88; 1.42 to 2.48); comorbidities of diabetes mellitus (2.07; 1.29–3.31), asthma (5.23; 1.59–17.26), and renal disease (7.48; 2.00–28.05); presenting complaints of abdominal pain (1.83; 1.32–2.55), fever (3.05; 2.10–4.44), and giddiness or vertigo (2.17; 1.26–3.73). There was a reduction in URV rate compared to the previous study in 2005 (1.93% versus 2.19%). Abdominal pain at the index visit remains a significant cause of URVs (22.2% versus 25.1%). Conclusions: Presenting complaints of neurological deficits, abdominal pain, fever, and discharge without follow-up were associated with wrong or delayed diagnoses among URVs.
Source Title: Medicina
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/157784
ISSN: 1010660X
DOI: 10.3390/medicina55080457
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
2019 URV - Medicina.pdfPublished version474.59 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

PublishedView/Download

Page view(s)

47
checked on Nov 14, 2019

Download(s)

1
checked on Nov 14, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.