Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2018.10.30
Title: Assessment of dyspneic patients in the emergency department using point-of-care lung and cardiac ultrasonography-a prospective observational study
Authors: Koh, Yiwen
Chua, Mui Teng 
Ho, Weng Hoe 
Lee, Chengjie
Chan, Gene Wai Han 
Kuan, Win Sen 
Keywords: Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Respiratory System
Emergency department (ED)
ultrasonography
dyspnea
pneumonia
pulmonary edema
STANDARD CHEST RADIOGRAPHY
HEART-FAILURE
ULTRASOUND
DIAGNOSIS
MANAGEMENT
PNEUMONIA
Issue Date: 1-Nov-2018
Publisher: AME PUBL CO
Citation: Koh, Yiwen, Chua, Mui Teng, Ho, Weng Hoe, Lee, Chengjie, Chan, Gene Wai Han, Kuan, Win Sen (2018-11-01). Assessment of dyspneic patients in the emergency department using point-of-care lung and cardiac ultrasonography-a prospective observational study. JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE 10 (11) : 6221-+. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2018.10.30
Abstract: © Journal of Thoracic Disease. Background: Lung ultrasonography is increasingly used in the emergency department (ED) as a standard adjunct in the evaluation of the breathless patient. The study objective was to ascertain the diagnostic accuracy of lung and cardiac ultrasound in undifferentiated dyspneic ED patients. Methods: We conducted this prospective observational study on patients presenting with dyspnea in the ED of a tertiary hospital. The sonographers who performed lung and cardiac ultrasound according to a locally-designed protocol were blinded to clinical and radiologic results. Ultrasonographic findings were subsequently compared with the final adjudicated diagnoses. Results: Between February and August 2015, 231 patients were recruited. There was male predominance (63.2%) with a mean age of 67.8 years. Overall, lung ultrasonography yielded correct diagnoses in 68.3% of patients. Our protocol had likelihood ratios of 3.63 [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.44-5.40], 3.73 (95% CI: 2.50-5.57) and 6.31 (95% CI: 3.72-10.72) for positive findings; and 0.42 (95% CI: 0.29-0.63), 0.35 (95% CI: 0.25-0.50), and 0.40 (95% CI: 0.28-0.56) for negative findings in the diagnoses of pneumonia, pulmonary edema, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma, respectively. Addition of bedside echocardiography was able to differentiate cardiogenic from nephrogenic pulmonary edema in 70% of patients. Conclusions: Lung ultrasonography, when complemented with other tools of investigation, aids evaluation, allows for earlier treatment and more accurate disposition of undifferentiated dyspneic patients in the ED. The addition of cardiac ultrasound was not able to reliably differentiate the causes of pulmonary edema.
Source Title: JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/156734
ISSN: 2072-1439
2077-6624
DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2018.10.30
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
2018 POCUS Dyspnea - JTD.pdfPublished version615.34 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

PublishedView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.