Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2018.10.30
DC FieldValue
dc.titleAssessment of dyspneic patients in the emergency department using point-of-care lung and cardiac ultrasonography-a prospective observational study
dc.contributor.authorKoh, Yiwen
dc.contributor.authorChua, Mui Teng
dc.contributor.authorHo, Weng Hoe
dc.contributor.authorLee, Chengjie
dc.contributor.authorChan, Gene Wai Han
dc.contributor.authorKuan, Win Sen
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-19T06:26:36Z
dc.date.available2019-07-19T06:26:36Z
dc.date.issued2018-11-01
dc.identifier.citationKoh, Yiwen, Chua, Mui Teng, Ho, Weng Hoe, Lee, Chengjie, Chan, Gene Wai Han, Kuan, Win Sen (2018-11-01). Assessment of dyspneic patients in the emergency department using point-of-care lung and cardiac ultrasonography-a prospective observational study. JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE 10 (11) : 6221-+. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2018.10.30
dc.identifier.issn2072-1439
dc.identifier.issn2077-6624
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/156734
dc.description.abstract© Journal of Thoracic Disease. Background: Lung ultrasonography is increasingly used in the emergency department (ED) as a standard adjunct in the evaluation of the breathless patient. The study objective was to ascertain the diagnostic accuracy of lung and cardiac ultrasound in undifferentiated dyspneic ED patients. Methods: We conducted this prospective observational study on patients presenting with dyspnea in the ED of a tertiary hospital. The sonographers who performed lung and cardiac ultrasound according to a locally-designed protocol were blinded to clinical and radiologic results. Ultrasonographic findings were subsequently compared with the final adjudicated diagnoses. Results: Between February and August 2015, 231 patients were recruited. There was male predominance (63.2%) with a mean age of 67.8 years. Overall, lung ultrasonography yielded correct diagnoses in 68.3% of patients. Our protocol had likelihood ratios of 3.63 [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.44-5.40], 3.73 (95% CI: 2.50-5.57) and 6.31 (95% CI: 3.72-10.72) for positive findings; and 0.42 (95% CI: 0.29-0.63), 0.35 (95% CI: 0.25-0.50), and 0.40 (95% CI: 0.28-0.56) for negative findings in the diagnoses of pneumonia, pulmonary edema, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma, respectively. Addition of bedside echocardiography was able to differentiate cardiogenic from nephrogenic pulmonary edema in 70% of patients. Conclusions: Lung ultrasonography, when complemented with other tools of investigation, aids evaluation, allows for earlier treatment and more accurate disposition of undifferentiated dyspneic patients in the ED. The addition of cardiac ultrasound was not able to reliably differentiate the causes of pulmonary edema.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAME PUBL CO
dc.sourceElements
dc.subjectScience & Technology
dc.subjectLife Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subjectRespiratory System
dc.subjectEmergency department (ED)
dc.subjectultrasonography
dc.subjectdyspnea
dc.subjectpneumonia
dc.subjectpulmonary edema
dc.subjectSTANDARD CHEST RADIOGRAPHY
dc.subjectHEART-FAILURE
dc.subjectULTRASOUND
dc.subjectDIAGNOSIS
dc.subjectMANAGEMENT
dc.subjectPNEUMONIA
dc.typeArticle
dc.date.updated2019-07-19T05:12:30Z
dc.contributor.departmentSURGERY
dc.description.doi10.21037/jtd.2018.10.30
dc.description.sourcetitleJOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE
dc.description.volume10
dc.description.issue11
dc.description.page6221-+
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
2018 POCUS Dyspnea - JTD.pdfPublished version615.34 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

PublishedView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.