Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Reliability of different image analysis methods for scanning laser Doppler flowmetry||Authors:||Kreis, A.J.
Omar Farouque, H.M.
|Issue Date:||May-2008||Citation:||Kreis, A.J., Nguyen, T., Rogers, S., Wang, J.J., Harazny, J., Michelson, G., Omar Farouque, H.M., Wong, T.Y. (2008-05). Reliability of different image analysis methods for scanning laser Doppler flowmetry. Current Eye Research 33 (5-6) : 493-499. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1080/02713680802069149||Abstract:||Purpose: To assess reliability and reproducibility of different analysis methods for retinal capillary flow, volume, and velocity from scanning laser Doppler flowmetry (SLDF) topography. Material and Methods: SLDF topography analysis using the default retinal flowmeter (HRF) were compared to that using automatic full-field perfusion image analyzer (AFFPIA) and quantified as intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Results: The AFFPIA full-field method had the highest reliability, with ICC 0.99 for capillary flow. The reproducibility using the AFFPIA full-field method was high ICC 0.74 for capillary flow. Conclusions: The AFFPIA full-field method is highly reliable and superior to the default HRF software. Copyright © Informa Healthcare USA, Inc.||Source Title:||Current Eye Research||URI:||http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/109587||ISSN:||02713683||DOI:||10.1080/02713680802069149|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.