Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Reliability of different image analysis methods for scanning laser Doppler flowmetry
Authors: Kreis, A.J.
Nguyen, T.
Rogers, S.
Wang, J.J.
Harazny, J.
Michelson, G.
Omar Farouque, H.M.
Wong, T.Y. 
Keywords: AFFPIA
Image analysis
Issue Date: May-2008
Citation: Kreis, A.J., Nguyen, T., Rogers, S., Wang, J.J., Harazny, J., Michelson, G., Omar Farouque, H.M., Wong, T.Y. (2008-05). Reliability of different image analysis methods for scanning laser Doppler flowmetry. Current Eye Research 33 (5-6) : 493-499. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
Abstract: Purpose: To assess reliability and reproducibility of different analysis methods for retinal capillary flow, volume, and velocity from scanning laser Doppler flowmetry (SLDF) topography. Material and Methods: SLDF topography analysis using the default retinal flowmeter (HRF) were compared to that using automatic full-field perfusion image analyzer (AFFPIA) and quantified as intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Results: The AFFPIA full-field method had the highest reliability, with ICC 0.99 for capillary flow. The reproducibility using the AFFPIA full-field method was high ICC 0.74 for capillary flow. Conclusions: The AFFPIA full-field method is highly reliable and superior to the default HRF software. Copyright © Informa Healthcare USA, Inc.
Source Title: Current Eye Research
ISSN: 02713683
DOI: 10.1080/02713680802069149
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.