1. ScholarBank@NUS
  2. 1. Staff
  3. Staff Publications
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1080/02713680802069149
DC FieldValue
dc.titleReliability of different image analysis methods for scanning laser Doppler flowmetry
dc.contributor.authorKreis, A.J.
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, T.
dc.contributor.authorRogers, S.
dc.contributor.authorWang, J.J.
dc.contributor.authorHarazny, J.
dc.contributor.authorMichelson, G.
dc.contributor.authorOmar Farouque, H.M.
dc.contributor.authorWong, T.Y.
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-26T07:47:40Z
dc.date.available2014-11-26T07:47:40Z
dc.date.issued2008-05
dc.identifier.citationKreis, A.J., Nguyen, T., Rogers, S., Wang, J.J., Harazny, J., Michelson, G., Omar Farouque, H.M., Wong, T.Y. (2008-05). Reliability of different image analysis methods for scanning laser Doppler flowmetry. Current Eye Research 33 (5-6) : 493-499. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1080/02713680802069149
dc.identifier.issn02713683
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/109587
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To assess reliability and reproducibility of different analysis methods for retinal capillary flow, volume, and velocity from scanning laser Doppler flowmetry (SLDF) topography. Material and Methods: SLDF topography analysis using the default retinal flowmeter (HRF) were compared to that using automatic full-field perfusion image analyzer (AFFPIA) and quantified as intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Results: The AFFPIA full-field method had the highest reliability, with ICC 0.99 for capillary flow. The reproducibility using the AFFPIA full-field method was high ICC 0.74 for capillary flow. Conclusions: The AFFPIA full-field method is highly reliable and superior to the default HRF software. Copyright © Informa Healthcare USA, Inc.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02713680802069149
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAFFPIA
dc.subjectFlowmetry
dc.subjectImage analysis
dc.subjectReliability
dc.subjectReproducibility
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentOPHTHALMOLOGY
dc.description.doi10.1080/02713680802069149
dc.description.sourcetitleCurrent Eye Research
dc.description.volume33
dc.description.issue5-6
dc.description.page493-499
dc.description.codenCEYRD
dc.identifier.isiut000256672100011
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.