Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Reliability of different image analysis methods for scanning laser Doppler flowmetry|
Omar Farouque, H.M.
|Citation:||Kreis, A.J., Nguyen, T., Rogers, S., Wang, J.J., Harazny, J., Michelson, G., Omar Farouque, H.M., Wong, T.Y. (2008-05). Reliability of different image analysis methods for scanning laser Doppler flowmetry. Current Eye Research 33 (5-6) : 493-499. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1080/02713680802069149|
|Abstract:||Purpose: To assess reliability and reproducibility of different analysis methods for retinal capillary flow, volume, and velocity from scanning laser Doppler flowmetry (SLDF) topography. Material and Methods: SLDF topography analysis using the default retinal flowmeter (HRF) were compared to that using automatic full-field perfusion image analyzer (AFFPIA) and quantified as intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Results: The AFFPIA full-field method had the highest reliability, with ICC 0.99 for capillary flow. The reproducibility using the AFFPIA full-field method was high ICC 0.74 for capillary flow. Conclusions: The AFFPIA full-field method is highly reliable and superior to the default HRF software. Copyright © Informa Healthcare USA, Inc.|
|Source Title:||Current Eye Research|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Oct 17, 2018
WEB OF SCIENCETM
checked on Oct 9, 2018
checked on Oct 12, 2018
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.