Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1080/02713680802069149
Title: Reliability of different image analysis methods for scanning laser Doppler flowmetry
Authors: Kreis, A.J.
Nguyen, T.
Rogers, S.
Wang, J.J.
Harazny, J.
Michelson, G.
Omar Farouque, H.M.
Wong, T.Y. 
Keywords: AFFPIA
Flowmetry
Image analysis
Reliability
Reproducibility
Issue Date: May-2008
Source: Kreis, A.J., Nguyen, T., Rogers, S., Wang, J.J., Harazny, J., Michelson, G., Omar Farouque, H.M., Wong, T.Y. (2008-05). Reliability of different image analysis methods for scanning laser Doppler flowmetry. Current Eye Research 33 (5-6) : 493-499. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1080/02713680802069149
Abstract: Purpose: To assess reliability and reproducibility of different analysis methods for retinal capillary flow, volume, and velocity from scanning laser Doppler flowmetry (SLDF) topography. Material and Methods: SLDF topography analysis using the default retinal flowmeter (HRF) were compared to that using automatic full-field perfusion image analyzer (AFFPIA) and quantified as intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Results: The AFFPIA full-field method had the highest reliability, with ICC 0.99 for capillary flow. The reproducibility using the AFFPIA full-field method was high ICC 0.74 for capillary flow. Conclusions: The AFFPIA full-field method is highly reliable and superior to the default HRF software. Copyright © Informa Healthcare USA, Inc.
Source Title: Current Eye Research
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/109587
ISSN: 02713683
DOI: 10.1080/02713680802069149
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

18
checked on Apr 18, 2018

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

15
checked on Apr 18, 2018

Page view(s)

18
checked on Mar 12, 2018

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.