Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Conceptualizing and testing a social cognitive model of the digital divide||Authors:||Wei, K.-K.
|Keywords:||Adoption and impact of IT
School IT environment
Social cognitive theory
|Issue Date:||2011||Citation:||Wei, K.-K., Teo, H.-H., Chan, H.C., Tan, B.C.Y. (2011). Conceptualizing and testing a social cognitive model of the digital divide. Information Systems Research 22 (1) : 170-187. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1090.0273||Abstract:||The digital divide has loomed as a public policy issue for over a decade. Yet, a theoretical account for the effects of the digital divide is currently lacking. This study examines three levels of the digital divide. The digital access divide (the first-level digital divide) is the inequality of access to information technology (IT) in homes and schools. The digital capability divide (the second-level digital divide) is the inequality of the capability to exploit IT arising from the first-level digital divide and other contextual factors. The digital outcome divide (the third-level digital divide) is the inequality of outcomes (e.g., learning and productivity) of exploiting IT arising from the second-level digital divide and other contextual factors. Drawing on social cognitive theory and computer self-efficacy literature, we developed a model to show how the digital access divide affects the digital capability divide and the digital outcome divide among students. The digital access divide focuses on computer ownership and usage in homes and schools. The digital capability divide and the digital outcome divide focus on computer self-efficacy and learning outcomes, respectively. This model was tested using data collected from over 4,000 students in Singapore. The results generate insights into the relationships among the three levels of the digital divide and provide a theoretical account for the effects of the digital divide. While school computing environments help to increase computer self-efficacy for all students, these factors do not eliminate knowledge the gap between students with and without home computers. Implications for theory and practice are discussed. © 2011 INFORMS.||Source Title:||Information Systems Research||URI:||http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/42455||ISSN:||10477047||DOI:||10.1287/isre.1090.0273|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on May 28, 2020
WEB OF SCIENCETM
checked on May 28, 2020
checked on Jun 1, 2020
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.