Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-024-02325-z
Title: Endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping in the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage in the elderly: a multicenter cohort study
Authors: Lee, Keng Siang
Siow, Isabel
Yang, Lily WY
Foo, Aaron SC
Zhang, John JY
Mathews, Ian 
Goh, Chun Peng
Teo, Colin 
Nagarjun, Bolem
Chen, Vanessa 
Lwin, Sein 
Teo, Kejia 
Low, Shiong Wen 
Sun, Ira SY 
Pang, Boon Chuan
Yang, Eugene WR 
Yang, Cunli
Gopinathan, Anil 
Yeo, Tseng Tsai
Nga, Vincent DW 
Issue Date: 2024
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Citation: Lee, Keng Siang, Siow, Isabel, Yang, Lily WY, Foo, Aaron SC, Zhang, John JY, Mathews, Ian, Goh, Chun Peng, Teo, Colin, Nagarjun, Bolem, Chen, Vanessa, Lwin, Sein, Teo, Kejia, Low, Shiong Wen, Sun, Ira SY, Pang, Boon Chuan, Yang, Eugene WR, Yang, Cunli, Gopinathan, Anil, Yeo, Tseng Tsai, Nga, Vincent DW (2024). Endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping in the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage in the elderly: a multicenter cohort study. Neurosurgical Review 47 (1). ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-024-02325-z
Abstract: AbstractThe comparability of endovascular coiling over neurosurgical clipping has not been firmly established in elderly patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH). Data were obtained from all patients with aSAH aged ≥60 across three tertiary hospitals in Singapore from 2014 to 2019. Outcome measures included modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 3 and at 6 months, and in-hospital mortality. Of the 134 patients analyzed, 84 (62.7%) underwent coiling and 50 (37.3%) underwent clipping. The endovascular group showed a higher incidence of good mRS score 0–2 at 3 months (OR = 2.45 [95%CI:1.16–5.20];p = 0.018), and a lower incidence of in-hospital mortality (OR = 0.31 [95%CI:0.10–0.91];p = 0.026). There were no significant difference between the two treatment groups in terms of good mRS score at 6 months (OR = 1.98 [95%CI:0.97–4.04];p = 0.060). There were no significant differences in the incidence of complications, such as aneurysm rebleed, delayed hydrocephalus, delayed ischemic neurological deficit and venous thromboembolism between the two treatment groups. However, fewer patients in the coiling group developed large infarcts requiring decompressive craniectomy (OR = 0.32 [95%CI:0.12–0.90];p = 0.025). Age, admission WFNS score I–III, and coiling were independent predictors of good functional outcomes at 3 months. Only age and admission WFNS score I–III remained significant predictors of good functional outcomes at 6 months. Endovascular coiling, compared with neurosurgical clipping, is associated with significantly better short term outcomes in carefully selected elderly patients with aSAH. Maximal intervention is recommended for aSAH in the young elderly age group and those with favorable WFNS scores.
Source Title: Neurosurgical Review
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/247330
ISSN: 1437-2320
DOI: 10.1007/s10143-024-02325-z
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
56) Coiling vs Clipping in Elderly aSAH.pdfPublished version1.28 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.