Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0213-7_10
Title: Approaches to understanding visual illusions
Authors: Soon, CS 
Dubey, R 
Ananyev, E 
Hsieh, PJ 
Issue Date: 4-Oct-2016
Publisher: Springer Singapore
Citation: Soon, CS, Dubey, R, Ananyev, E, Hsieh, PJ (2016-10-04). Approaches to understanding visual illusions. Computational and Cognitive Neuroscience of Vision. Cognitive Science and Technology : 221-233. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0213-7_10
Abstract: Visual illusions can be broadly categorized into three types: physiological/pathological, perceptual, and ambiguous (bistable/multistable). Whether seen as malfunctions or natural consequences of the normal operations of the visual system, these deviations from the veridical perception of physical sources of sensory inputs provide rich test beds for the evaluation of theories of perception. Here we consider the strengths and weaknesses of three theoretical frameworks: conventional feature detection, empirical ranking and Bayesian decision, in accounting for each type of illusion.
Source Title: Computational and Cognitive Neuroscience of Vision. Cognitive Science and Technology
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/236419
ISBN: 9789811002113
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-0213-7_10
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
Soon__2017.pdfAccepted version229.22 kBAdobe PDF

CLOSED

Published

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.