Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0213-7_10
Title: | Approaches to understanding visual illusions | Authors: | Soon, CS Dubey, R Ananyev, E Hsieh, PJ |
Issue Date: | 4-Oct-2016 | Publisher: | Springer Singapore | Citation: | Soon, CS, Dubey, R, Ananyev, E, Hsieh, PJ (2016-10-04). Approaches to understanding visual illusions. Computational and Cognitive Neuroscience of Vision. Cognitive Science and Technology : 221-233. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0213-7_10 | Abstract: | Visual illusions can be broadly categorized into three types: physiological/pathological, perceptual, and ambiguous (bistable/multistable). Whether seen as malfunctions or natural consequences of the normal operations of the visual system, these deviations from the veridical perception of physical sources of sensory inputs provide rich test beds for the evaluation of theories of perception. Here we consider the strengths and weaknesses of three theoretical frameworks: conventional feature detection, empirical ranking and Bayesian decision, in accounting for each type of illusion. | Source Title: | Computational and Cognitive Neuroscience of Vision. Cognitive Science and Technology | URI: | https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/236419 | ISBN: | 9789811002113 | DOI: | 10.1007/978-981-10-0213-7_10 |
Appears in Collections: | Staff Publications Elements |
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | Access Settings | Version | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Soon__2017.pdf | Accepted version | 229.22 kB | Adobe PDF | CLOSED | Published |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.