Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Cardioprotective effect of combination therapy by mild hypothermia and local or remote ischemic preconditioning in isolated rat hearts||Authors:||Hjortbak, Marie V.
Jespersen, Nichlas R.
Jensen, Rebekka V.
Lassen, Thomas R.
Povlsen, Jonas A.
Støttrup, Nicolaj B.
Hausenloy, Derek J.
Bøtker, Hans Erik
|Issue Date:||11-Jan-2021||Publisher:||Nature Research||Citation:||Hjortbak, Marie V., Jespersen, Nichlas R., Jensen, Rebekka V., Lassen, Thomas R., Hjort, Johanne, Povlsen, Jonas A., Støttrup, Nicolaj B., Hansen, Jakob, Hausenloy, Derek J., Bøtker, Hans Erik (2021-01-11). Cardioprotective effect of combination therapy by mild hypothermia and local or remote ischemic preconditioning in isolated rat hearts. Scientific Reports 11 (1) : 265. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79449-x||Rights:||Attribution 4.0 International||Abstract:||A multitargeted strategy to treat the consequences of ischemia and reperfusion (IR) injury in acute myocardial infarction may add cardioprotection beyond reperfusion therapy alone. We investigated the cardioprotective effect of mild hypothermia combined with local ischemic preconditioning (IPC) or remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) on IR injury in isolated rat hearts. Moreover, we aimed to define the optimum timing of initiating hypothermia and evaluate underlying cardioprotective mechanisms. Compared to infarct size in normothermic controls (56 ± 4%), mild hypothermia during the entire or final 20 min of the ischemic period reduced infarct size (34 ± 2%, p < 0.01; 35 ± 5%, p < 0.01, respectively), while no reduction was seen when hypothermia was initiated at reperfusion (51 ± 4%, p = 0.90). In all groups with effect of mild hypothermia, IPC further reduced infarct size. In contrast, we found no additive effect on infarct size between hypothermic controls (20 ± 3%) and the combination of mild hypothermia and RIC (33 ± 4%, p = 0.09). Differences in temporal lactate dehydrogenase release patterns suggested an anti-ischemic effect by mild hypothermia, while IPC and RIC preferentially targeted reperfusion injury. In conclusion, additive underlying mechanisms seem to provide an additive effect of mild hypothermia and IPC, whereas the more clinically applicable RIC does not add cardioprotection beyond mild hypothermia. © 2021, The Author(s).||Source Title:||Scientific Reports||URI:||https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/233607||ISSN:||2045-2322||DOI:||10.1038/s41598-020-79449-x||Rights:||Attribution 4.0 International|
|Appears in Collections:||Elements|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
|10_1038_s41598-020-79449-x.pdf||3.2 MB||Adobe PDF|
checked on Dec 2, 2022
checked on Dec 1, 2022
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License