Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.51138
Title: Trajectories of functional performance recovery after inpatient geriatric rehabilitation: an observational study
Authors: Soh, Cheng Hwee
Reijnierse, Esmee M.
Tuttle, Camilla
Marston, Celia
Goonan, Rose
Lim, Wen Kwang
Maier, Andrea B. 
Keywords: Activities of daily living
Aged
Issue Date: 16-Jun-2021
Publisher: John Wiley and Sons Inc
Citation: Soh, Cheng Hwee, Reijnierse, Esmee M., Tuttle, Camilla, Marston, Celia, Goonan, Rose, Lim, Wen Kwang, Maier, Andrea B. (2021-06-16). Trajectories of functional performance recovery after inpatient geriatric rehabilitation: an observational study. Medical Journal of Australia 215 (4) : 173-179. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.51138
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: Objective: To identify functional performance trajectories and the characteristics of people who receive inpatient geriatric rehabilitation after hospital admissions. Design, setting, participants: REStORing health of acutely unwell adulTs (RESORT) is an observational, prospective, longitudinal inception cohort study of consecutive patients admitted to geriatric rehabilitation wards at the Royal Melbourne Hospital. Recruitment commenced on 15 October 2017. Main outcome measures: Functional performance, assessed with the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) scales two weeks before acute hospitalisation, on admission to and discharge from geriatric rehabilitation, and three months after discharge from geriatric rehabilitation. Results: A total of 618 rehabilitation patients were included in our analysis. For each of the two scales, three distinct functional performance trajectories were identified by latent class growth modelling: poor at baseline and 3-month follow-up (remained poor: ADL, 6.6% of patients; IADL, 42%), good at baseline but poor recovery (deteriorated: ADL, 33%; IADL, 20%), and good at baseline and good recovery (recovered: ADL, 60%; IADL, 35%). Higher Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) score (v recovered, per point: odds ratio [OR], 2.51; 95% CI, 1.64–3.84) and cognitive impairment (OR, 6.33; 95% CI, 2.09–19.1) were associated with greater likelihood of remaining poor in ADL, and also with deterioration (CFS score: OR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.45–2.13; cognitive impairment: OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.24–2.82). Higher CFS score (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.37–1.97) and cognitive impairment (OR, 3.60; 95% CI, 2.31–5.61) were associated with remaining poor in IADL, and higher CFS score was also associated with deterioration (OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.33–1.99). Conclusions: Based on ADL assessments, most people who underwent inpatient geriatric rehabilitation regained their baseline functional performance. As higher CFS score and cognitive impairment were associated with poorer functional recovery, assessing frailty and cognition at hospital admission could assist intervention and discharge planning. © 2021 The Authors. Medical Journal of Australia published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of AMPCo Pty Ltd
Source Title: Medical Journal of Australia
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/233305
ISSN: 0025-729X
DOI: 10.5694/mja2.51138
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_5694_mja2_51138.pdf559.3 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons