Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab387
Title: Meropenem Versus Piperacillin-Tazobactam for Definitive Treatment of Bloodstream Infections Caused by AmpC β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacter spp, Citrobacter freundii, Morganella morganii, Providencia spp, or Serratia marcescens: A Pilot Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (MERINO-2)
Authors: Stewart, AG
Paterson, DL
Young, B
Lye, DC 
Davis, JS
Schneider, K
Yilmaz, M
Dinleyici, R
Runnegar, N
Henderson, A
Archuleta, S 
Kalimuddin, S 
Forde, BM
Chatfield, MD
Bauer, MJ
Lipman, J
Harris-Brown, T
Harris, PNA
Keywords: Enterobacterales
ampC β-lactamase
carbapenem
clinical trial
piperacillin-tazobactam
Issue Date: 1-Aug-2021
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Citation: Stewart, AG, Paterson, DL, Young, B, Lye, DC, Davis, JS, Schneider, K, Yilmaz, M, Dinleyici, R, Runnegar, N, Henderson, A, Archuleta, S, Kalimuddin, S, Forde, BM, Chatfield, MD, Bauer, MJ, Lipman, J, Harris-Brown, T, Harris, PNA (2021-08-01). Meropenem Versus Piperacillin-Tazobactam for Definitive Treatment of Bloodstream Infections Caused by AmpC β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacter spp, Citrobacter freundii, Morganella morganii, Providencia spp, or Serratia marcescens: A Pilot Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (MERINO-2). Open Forum Infectious Diseases 8 (8) : ofab387-. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab387
Abstract: Background: Carbapenems are recommended treatment for serious infections caused by AmpC-producing gram-negative bacteria but can select for carbapenem resistance. Piperacillin-tazobactam may be a suitable alternative. Methods: We enrolled adult patients with bloodstream infection due to chromosomal AmpC producers in a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Patients were assigned 1:1 to receive piperacillin-tazobactam 4.5 g every 6 hours or meropenem 1 g every 8 hours. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of death, clinical failure, microbiological failure, and microbiological relapse at 30 days. Results: Seventy-two patients underwent randomization and were included in the primary analysis population. Eleven of 38 patients (29%) randomized to piperacillin-tazobactam met the primary outcome compared with 7 of 34 patients (21%) in the meropenem group (risk difference, 8% [95% confidence interval {CI},-12% to 28%]). Effects were consistent in an analysis of the per-protocol population. Within the subcomponents of the primary outcome, 5 of 38 (13%) experienced microbiological failure in the piperacillin-tazobactam group compared to 0 of 34 patients (0%) in the meropenem group (risk difference, 13% [95% CI, 2% to 24%]). In contrast, 0% vs 9% of microbiological relapses were seen in the piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem arms, respectively. Susceptibility to piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem using broth microdilution was found in 96.5% and 100% of isolates, respectively. The most common AmpC β-lactamase genes identified were blaCMY-2, blaDHA-17, blaCMH-3, and blaACT-17. No ESBL, OXA, or other carbapenemase genes were identified. Conclusions: Among patients with bloodstream infection due to AmpC producers, piperacillin-tazobactam may lead to more microbiological failures, although fewer microbiological relapses were seen. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT02437045.
Source Title: Open Forum Infectious Diseases
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/206194
ISSN: 23288957
DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofab387
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
Meropenem Versus Piperacillin-Tazobactam for Definitive Treatment of Bloodstream Infections Caused by AmpC β-Lactamase-Produ.pdfPublished version693.38 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

PublishedView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.