Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40345-020-0178-4
Title: The effects of vagus nerve stimulation on the course and outcomes of patients with bipolar disorder in a treatment-resistant depressive episode: a 5-year prospective registry
Authors: McAllister-Williams, R.H.
Sousa, S.
Kumar, A.
Greco, T.
Bunker, M.T.
Aaronson, S.T.
Conway, C.R.
Rush, A.J. 
Keywords: Bipolar disorder
Depression
Response
Suicidality
Treatment-resistant depression
Vagus Nerve Stimulation Therapy
VNS TRD registry
Issue Date: 2020
Publisher: Springer
Citation: McAllister-Williams, R.H., Sousa, S., Kumar, A., Greco, T., Bunker, M.T., Aaronson, S.T., Conway, C.R., Rush, A.J. (2020). The effects of vagus nerve stimulation on the course and outcomes of patients with bipolar disorder in a treatment-resistant depressive episode: a 5-year prospective registry. International Journal of Bipolar Disorders 8 (1) : 13. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40345-020-0178-4
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: Background: To compare illness characteristics, treatment history, response and durability, and suicidality scores over a 5-year period in patients with treatment-el resistant bipolar depression participating in a prospective, multicenter, open-labregistry and receiving Vagus Nerve Stimulation Therapy (VNS Therapy) plus treatment-as-usual (VNS + TAU) or TAU alone. Methods: Response was defined as ≥ 50% decrease from baseline Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score at 3, 6, 9, or 12 months post-baseline. Response was retained while MADRS score remained ≥ 40% lower than baseline. Time-to-events was estimated using Kaplan–Meier (KM) analysis and compared using log-rank test. Suicidality was assessed using the MADRS Item 10 score. Results: At baseline (entry into registry), the VNS + TAU group (N = 97) had more episodes of depression, psychiatric hospitalizations, lifetime suicide attempts and higher suicidality score, more severe symptoms (based on MADRS and other scales), and higher rate of prior electroconvulsive therapy than TAU group (N = 59). Lifetime use of medications was similar between the groups (a mean of 9) and was consistent with the severe treatment-resistant nature of their depression. Over 5 years, 63% (61/97) in VNS + TAU had an initial response compared with 39% (23/59) in TAU. The time-to-initial response was significantly quicker for VNS + TAU than for TAU (p < 0.03). Among responders in the first year after implant, the KM estimate of the median time-to-relapse from initial response was 15.2 vs 7.6 months for VNS + TAU compared with TAU (difference was not statistically significant). The mean reduction in suicidality score across the study visits was significantly greater in the VNS + TAU than in the TAU group (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The patients who received VNS + TAU included in this analysis had severe bipolar depression that had proved extremely difficult to treat. The TAU comparator group were similar though had slightly less severe illnesses on some measures and had less history of suicide attempts. Treatment with VNS + TAU was associated with a higher likelihood of attaining a response compared to TAU alone. VNS + TAU was also associated with a significantly greater mean reduction in suicidality. Limitations: In this registry study, participants were not randomized to the study treatment group, VNS Therapy stimulation parameters were not controlled, and there was a high attrition rate over 5 years. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00320372. Registered 3 May 2006, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00320372 (retrospectively registered). © 2020, The Author(s).
Source Title: International Journal of Bipolar Disorders
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/198729
ISSN: 21947511
DOI: 10.1186/s40345-020-0178-4
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1186_s40345_020_0178_4.pdf1.08 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons