Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_192_18
Title: Comparison of postoperative cognitive decline in patients undergoing conventional vs miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass: A randomized, controlled trial
Authors: Yuhe, K.
Huey Chew, S. 
Ang, A. 
Ge Ng, R.R.
Boonkiangwong, N.
Liu, W. 
Hao Toh, A.H.
Caleb, M.G. 
Man Ho, R.C. 
Ti, Lian Kah 
Keywords: Cardiopulmonary bypass
postoperative cognitive decline
repeatable battery of neuropsychological status
Issue Date: 2020
Publisher: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
Citation: Yuhe, K., Huey Chew, S., Ang, A., Ge Ng, R.R., Boonkiangwong, N., Liu, W., Hao Toh, A.H., Caleb, M.G., Man Ho, R.C., Ti, Lian Kah (2020). Comparison of postoperative cognitive decline in patients undergoing conventional vs miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass: A randomized, controlled trial. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia 23 (3) : 309-314. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_192_18
Rights: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Abstract: Background: Neurocognitive dysfunction is a common complication of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with incidence of 19-38%. The miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass (MCPB) system was developed to reduce hemodilution and inflammation and provides better cerebral protection than conventional cardiopulmonary bypass (CCPB). In a meta-analysis, MCPB was associated with a 10-fold reduction in the incidence of strokes. However, its effect on postoperative cognitive decline (POCD) is unknown. We assessed if MCPB decreases POCD after CABG and compared the risk factors. Methods: A total of 71 Asian patients presenting for elective CABG at a tertiary center were enrolled. They were randomly assigned to MCPB (n = 36) or CCPB group (n = 35) and followed up in a single-blinded, prospective, randomized controlled trial. The primary outcome was POCD as measured by the repeatable battery of neuropsychological status (RBANS). Inflammatory markers (tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-6), hematocrit levels, and neutron-specific enolase (NSE) levels were studied. Results: Overall, the incidence of POCD at 3 months was 50%, and this was not significantly different between both groups (51.4 vs 50.0%, P = 0.90). Having <6 years of formal education [risk ratio (RR) = 3.014, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.054-8.618, P = 0.040] was significantly associated with POCD in the CCPB group, while the lowest hematocrit during cardiopulmonary bypass was independently associated with POCD in the MCPB group (RR = 0.931, 95% CI = 0.868-0.998, P = 0.044). The postoperative inflammatory markers and NSE levels were similar between the two groups. Conclusions: This study shows that the MCPB was not superior to CCPB with cell salvage and biocompatible tubing with regard to the neurocognitive outcomes measured by the RBANS. � 2020 Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow.
Source Title: Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/197688
ISSN: 9719784
DOI: 10.4103/aca.ACA_192_18
Rights: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_4103_aca_ACA_192_18.pdf579.57 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons