Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Shifting care from hospital to community, a strategy to integrate care in Singapore: Process evaluation of implementation fidelity
Authors: Nurjono, M. 
Shrestha, P. 
Ang, I.Y.H.
Shiraz, F. 
Eh, K.X. 
Toh, S.-A.E.S. 
Vrijhoef, H.J.M.
Keywords: Implementation fidelity
Integrated care
Process evaluation
Realist evaluation
Shift from hospital to community
Issue Date: 2020
Publisher: BioMed Central Ltd.
Citation: Nurjono, M., Shrestha, P., Ang, I.Y.H., Shiraz, F., Eh, K.X., Toh, S.-A.E.S., Vrijhoef, H.J.M. (2020). Shifting care from hospital to community, a strategy to integrate care in Singapore: Process evaluation of implementation fidelity. BMC Health Services Research 20 (1) : 452. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: Background: Accessibility to efficient and person-centered healthcare delivery drives healthcare transformation in many countries. In Singapore, specialist outpatient clinics (SOCs) are commonly congested due to increasing demands for chronic care. To improve this situation, the National University Health System (NUHS) Regional Health System (RHS) started an integrated care initiative,the Right-Site Care (RSC) program in 2014. Through collaborations between SOCs at the National University Hospital and primary and community care (PCC) clinics in the western region of the county, the program was designed to facilitate timely discharge and appropriate transition of patients, who no longer required specialist care, to the community. The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation fidelity of the NUHS RHS RSC program using the modified Conceptual Framework for Implementation Fidelity (CFIF), at three distinct levels; providers, organizational, and system levels to explain outcomes of the program and to inform further development of (similar) programs. Methods: A convergent parallel mixed methods study using the realist evaluation approach was used. Data were collected between 2016 and 2018 through non-participatory observations, reviews of medical records and program database, together with semi-structured interviews with healthcare providers. Triangulation of data streams was applied guided by the modified CFIF. Results: Our findings showed four out of six program components were implemented with low level of fidelity, and 9112 suitable patients were referred to the program while 3032 (33.3%) declined to be enrolled. Moderating factors found to influence fidelity included: (i) complexity of program, (ii) evolving providers' responsiveness, (iii) facilitation through synergistic partnership, training of PCC providers by specialists and supportive structures: care coordinators, guiding protocols, shared electronic medical record and shared pharmacy, (iv) lack of organization reinforcement, and (v) mismatch between program goals, healthcare financing and providers' reimbursement. Conclusion: Functional integration alone is insufficient for a successful right-site care program implementation. Improvement in relationships between providers, organizations, and patients are also warranted for further development of the program. © 2020 The Author(s).
Source Title: BMC Health Services Research
ISSN: 14726963
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05263-w
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1186_s12913_020_05263_w.pdf1.86 MBAdobe PDF



Google ScholarTM



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons