Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.08.069
Title: Bayesian calibration of building energy models with large datasets
Authors: Chong, Adrian 
Lam, Khee Poh 
Pozzi, Matteo
Yang, Junjing
Keywords: Science & Technology
Technology
Construction & Building Technology
Energy & Fuels
Engineering, Civil
Engineering
Building simulation
Bayesian calibration
Uncertainty analysis
Hamiltonian Monte Carlo
No-U-Turn Sampler
SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS METHODS
SIMULATION-MODELS
MONTE-CARLO
PREDICTION
MATCH
Issue Date: 1-Nov-2017
Publisher: ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
Citation: Chong, Adrian, Lam, Khee Poh, Pozzi, Matteo, Yang, Junjing (2017-11-01). Bayesian calibration of building energy models with large datasets. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS 154 : 343-355. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.08.069
Abstract: Bayesian calibration as proposed by Kennedy and O'Hagan [22] has been increasingly applied to building energy models due to its ability to account for the discrepancy between observed values and model predictions. However, its application has been limited to calibration using monthly aggregated data because it is computationally inefficient when the dataset is large. This study focuses on improvements to the current implementation of Bayesian calibration to building energy simulation. This is achieved by: (1) using information theory to select a representative subset of the entire dataset for the calibration, and (2) using a more effective Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm, the No-U-Turn Sampler (NUTS), which is an extension of Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) to explore the posterior distribution. The calibrated model was assessed by evaluating both accuracy and convergence. Application of the proposed method is demonstrated using two cases studies: (1) a TRNSYS model of a water-cooled chiller in a mixed-use building in Singapore, and (2) an EnergyPlus model of the cooling system of an office building in Pennsylvania, U.S.A. In both case studies, convergence was achieved for all parameters of the posterior distribution, with Gelman–Rubin statistics Rˆ within 1 ± 0.1. The coefficient of variation of the root mean squared error (CVRMSE) and normalized mean biased error (NMBE) were also within the thresholds set by ASHRAE Guideline 14 [1].
Source Title: ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/191975
ISSN: 0378-7788,1872-6178
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.08.069
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
elsarticle-template.pdfAccepted version3.24 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

Post-printView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.