Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.08.069
Title: | Bayesian calibration of building energy models with large datasets | Authors: | Chong, Adrian Lam, Khee Poh Pozzi, Matteo Yang, Junjing |
Keywords: | Science & Technology Technology Construction & Building Technology Energy & Fuels Engineering, Civil Engineering Building simulation Bayesian calibration Uncertainty analysis Hamiltonian Monte Carlo No-U-Turn Sampler SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS METHODS SIMULATION-MODELS MONTE-CARLO PREDICTION MATCH |
Issue Date: | 1-Nov-2017 | Publisher: | ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA | Citation: | Chong, Adrian, Lam, Khee Poh, Pozzi, Matteo, Yang, Junjing (2017-11-01). Bayesian calibration of building energy models with large datasets. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS 154 : 343-355. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.08.069 | Abstract: | Bayesian calibration as proposed by Kennedy and O'Hagan [22] has been increasingly applied to building energy models due to its ability to account for the discrepancy between observed values and model predictions. However, its application has been limited to calibration using monthly aggregated data because it is computationally inefficient when the dataset is large. This study focuses on improvements to the current implementation of Bayesian calibration to building energy simulation. This is achieved by: (1) using information theory to select a representative subset of the entire dataset for the calibration, and (2) using a more effective Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm, the No-U-Turn Sampler (NUTS), which is an extension of Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) to explore the posterior distribution. The calibrated model was assessed by evaluating both accuracy and convergence. Application of the proposed method is demonstrated using two cases studies: (1) a TRNSYS model of a water-cooled chiller in a mixed-use building in Singapore, and (2) an EnergyPlus model of the cooling system of an office building in Pennsylvania, U.S.A. In both case studies, convergence was achieved for all parameters of the posterior distribution, with Gelman–Rubin statistics Rˆ within 1 ± 0.1. The coefficient of variation of the root mean squared error (CVRMSE) and normalized mean biased error (NMBE) were also within the thresholds set by ASHRAE Guideline 14 [1]. | Source Title: | ENERGY AND BUILDINGS | URI: | https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/191975 | ISSN: | 0378-7788,1872-6178 | DOI: | 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.08.069 |
Appears in Collections: | Staff Publications Elements |
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | Access Settings | Version | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
elsarticle-template.pdf | Accepted version | 3.24 MB | Adobe PDF | OPEN | Post-print | View/Download |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.