Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.06.028
Title: Guidelines for the Bayesian calibration of building energy models
Authors: Adrian Chong 
Kathrin Menberg
Keywords: Science & Technology
Technology
Construction & Building Technology
Energy & Fuels
Engineering, Civil
Engineering
Bayesian calibration
Building energy modeling
Building simulation
Gaussian process
Hamiltonian Monte Carlo
SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS METHODS
COMPUTER-MODELS
UNCERTAINTY
SIMULATION
PREDICTION
DESIGN
Issue Date: 1-Sep-2018
Publisher: ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
Citation: Adrian Chong, Kathrin Menberg (2018-09-01). Guidelines for the Bayesian calibration of building energy models. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS 174 : 527-547. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.06.028
Abstract: This paper provides practical guidelines to the Bayesian calibration of building energy models using the probabilistic programming language Stan. While previous studies showed the applicability of the calibration method to building simulation, its practicality is still impeded by its complexity and the need to specify a whole range of information due to its Bayesian nature. We ease the reader into the practical application of Bayesian calibration to building energy models by providing the corresponding code and user guidelines with this paper. Using a case study, we demonstrate the application of Kennedy and O'Hagan's (KOH) [1] Bayesian calibration framework to an EnergyPlus whole building energy model. The case study is used to analyze the sensitivity of the posterior distributions to the number of calibration parameters. The study also looks into the influence of prior specification on the resulting (1) posterior distributions; (2) calibrated predictions; and (3) model inadequacy that is revealed by a discrepancy between the observed data and the model predictions. Results from the case study suggest that over-parameterization can result in a significant loss of posterior precision. Additionally, using strong prior information for the calibration parameters may dominate any influence from the data leading to poor posterior inference of the calibration parameters. Lastly, this study shows that it may be misleading to assume that the posteriors of the calibration parameters are representative of their true values and their associated uncertainty simply because the calibrated predictions matches the measured output well.
Source Title: ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/191893
ISSN: 0378-7788
1872-6178
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.06.028
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
accepted manuscript.pdfAccepted version3.06 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

Post-printView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.