Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29409
Title: Noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography for identification of ischemic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors: Wu, W
Pan, D.-R
Foin, N 
Pang, S
Ye, P
Holm, N
Ren, X.-M
Luo, J
Nanjundappa, A
Chen, S.-L
Keywords: aged
blood
computed tomographic angiography
coronary artery disease
diagnostic imaging
female
fractional flow reserve
human
male
meta analysis
middle aged
odds ratio
procedures
sensitivity and specificity
standards
Aged
Computed Tomography Angiography
Coronary Artery Disease
Female
Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Odds Ratio
Sensitivity and Specificity
Issue Date: 2016
Publisher: Nature Publishing Group
Citation: Wu, W, Pan, D.-R, Foin, N, Pang, S, Ye, P, Holm, N, Ren, X.-M, Luo, J, Nanjundappa, A, Chen, S.-L (2016). Noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography for identification of ischemic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Scientific Reports 6 : 29409. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29409
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: Detection of coronary ischemic lesions by fractional flow reserve (FFR) has been established as the gold standard. In recent years, novel computer based methods have emerged and they can provide simulation of FFR using coronary artery images acquired from coronary computed tomography angiography (FFR CT). This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate diagnostic performance of FFR CT using FFR as the reference standard. Databases of PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Medion and Web of Science were searched. Seven studies met the inclusion criteria, including 833 stable patients (1377 vessels or lesions) with suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD). The patient-based analysis showed pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) for detection of ischemic lesions were 0.89 [95%confidence interval (CI), 0.85-0.93], 0.76 (95%CI, 0.64-0.84) and 26.21 (95%CI, 13.14-52.28). At a per-vessel or per-lesion level, the pooled estimates were as follows: sensitivity 0.84 (95%CI, 0.80-0.87), specificity 0.76 (95%CI, 0.67-0.83) and DOR 16.87 (95%CI, 9.41-30.25). Area under summary receiver operating curves was 0.90 (95%CI, 0.87-0.92) and 0.86 (95%CI, 0.83-0.89) at the two analysis levels, respectively. In conclusion, FFR CT technology achieves a moderate diagnostic performance for noninvasive identification of ischemic lesions in stable patients with suspected or known CAD in comparison to invasive FFR measurement.
Source Title: Scientific Reports
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/182452
ISSN: 2045-2322
DOI: 10.1038/srep29409
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1038_srep29409.pdf2.61 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons