Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29409
DC FieldValue
dc.titleNoninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography for identification of ischemic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis
dc.contributor.authorWu, W
dc.contributor.authorPan, D.-R
dc.contributor.authorFoin, N
dc.contributor.authorPang, S
dc.contributor.authorYe, P
dc.contributor.authorHolm, N
dc.contributor.authorRen, X.-M
dc.contributor.authorLuo, J
dc.contributor.authorNanjundappa, A
dc.contributor.authorChen, S.-L
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-31T11:30:55Z
dc.date.available2020-10-31T11:30:55Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationWu, W, Pan, D.-R, Foin, N, Pang, S, Ye, P, Holm, N, Ren, X.-M, Luo, J, Nanjundappa, A, Chen, S.-L (2016). Noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography for identification of ischemic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Scientific Reports 6 : 29409. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29409
dc.identifier.issn2045-2322
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/182452
dc.description.abstractDetection of coronary ischemic lesions by fractional flow reserve (FFR) has been established as the gold standard. In recent years, novel computer based methods have emerged and they can provide simulation of FFR using coronary artery images acquired from coronary computed tomography angiography (FFR CT). This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate diagnostic performance of FFR CT using FFR as the reference standard. Databases of PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Medion and Web of Science were searched. Seven studies met the inclusion criteria, including 833 stable patients (1377 vessels or lesions) with suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD). The patient-based analysis showed pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) for detection of ischemic lesions were 0.89 [95%confidence interval (CI), 0.85-0.93], 0.76 (95%CI, 0.64-0.84) and 26.21 (95%CI, 13.14-52.28). At a per-vessel or per-lesion level, the pooled estimates were as follows: sensitivity 0.84 (95%CI, 0.80-0.87), specificity 0.76 (95%CI, 0.67-0.83) and DOR 16.87 (95%CI, 9.41-30.25). Area under summary receiver operating curves was 0.90 (95%CI, 0.87-0.92) and 0.86 (95%CI, 0.83-0.89) at the two analysis levels, respectively. In conclusion, FFR CT technology achieves a moderate diagnostic performance for noninvasive identification of ischemic lesions in stable patients with suspected or known CAD in comparison to invasive FFR measurement.
dc.publisherNature Publishing Group
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceUnpaywall 20201031
dc.subjectaged
dc.subjectblood
dc.subjectcomputed tomographic angiography
dc.subjectcoronary artery disease
dc.subjectdiagnostic imaging
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjectfractional flow reserve
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectmeta analysis
dc.subjectmiddle aged
dc.subjectodds ratio
dc.subjectprocedures
dc.subjectsensitivity and specificity
dc.subjectstandards
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectComputed Tomography Angiography
dc.subjectCoronary Artery Disease
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectFractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectOdds Ratio
dc.subjectSensitivity and Specificity
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentDUKE-NUS MEDICAL SCHOOL
dc.description.doi10.1038/srep29409
dc.description.sourcetitleScientific Reports
dc.description.volume6
dc.description.page29409
dc.published.statepublished
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1038_srep29409.pdf2.61 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons