Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29769
Title: Evaluation of a Micro-Optical Coherence Tomography for the Corneal Endothelium in an Animal Model
Authors: Ang, M 
Konstantopoulos, A
Goh, G
Htoon, H.M 
Seah, X
Lwin, N.C
Liu, X
Chen, S
Liu, L
Mehta, J.S 
Keywords: animal
confocal microscopy
cornea disease
cornea endothelium
diagnostic imaging
disease model
evaluation study
human
optical coherence tomography
procedures
reproducibility
scanning electron microscopy
sensitivity and specificity
Sprague Dawley rat
ultrastructure
Animals
Corneal Diseases
Disease Models, Animal
Endothelium, Corneal
Humans
Microscopy, Confocal
Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
Rats, Sprague-Dawley
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Tomography, Optical Coherence
Issue Date: 2016
Publisher: Nature Publishing Group
Citation: Ang, M, Konstantopoulos, A, Goh, G, Htoon, H.M, Seah, X, Lwin, N.C, Liu, X, Chen, S, Liu, L, Mehta, J.S (2016). Evaluation of a Micro-Optical Coherence Tomography for the Corneal Endothelium in an Animal Model. Scientific Reports 6 : 29769. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29769
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: Recent developments in optical coherence tomography (OCT) systems for the cornea have limited resolution or acquisition speed. In this study we aim to evaluate the use of a 'micro-OCT' (?OCT ?1 ?m axial resolution) compared to existing imaging modalities using animal models of corneal endothelial disease. We used established cryoinjury and bullous keratopathy models in Sprague Dawley rats comparing ex vivo ?OCT imaging in normal and diseased eyes to (1) histology; (2) in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM); and (3) scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Qualitative and quantitative comparisons amongst imaging modalities were performed using mean endothelial cell circularity [(4? × Area)/Perimeter 2[ with coefficient of variation (COV). We found that ?OCT imaging was able to delineate endothelial cells (with nuclei), detect inflammatory cells, and corneal layers with histology-like resolution, comparable to existing imaging modalities. The mean endothelial cell circularity score was 0.88 ± 0.03, 0.87 ± 0.04 and 0.88 ± 0.05 (P = 0.216) for the SEM, IVCM and ?OCT respectively, with SEM producing homogenous endothelial cell images (COV = 0.028) compared to the IVCM (0.051) and ?OCT (0.062). In summary, our preliminary study suggests that the ?OCT may be useful for achieving non-contact, histology-like images of the cornea for endothelial cell evaluation, which requires further development for in vivo imaging.
Source Title: Scientific Reports
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/182447
ISSN: 2045-2322
DOI: 10.1038/srep29769
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1038_srep29769.pdf2.72 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons