Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29769
DC FieldValue
dc.titleEvaluation of a Micro-Optical Coherence Tomography for the Corneal Endothelium in an Animal Model
dc.contributor.authorAng, M
dc.contributor.authorKonstantopoulos, A
dc.contributor.authorGoh, G
dc.contributor.authorHtoon, H.M
dc.contributor.authorSeah, X
dc.contributor.authorLwin, N.C
dc.contributor.authorLiu, X
dc.contributor.authorChen, S
dc.contributor.authorLiu, L
dc.contributor.authorMehta, J.S
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-31T11:29:57Z
dc.date.available2020-10-31T11:29:57Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationAng, M, Konstantopoulos, A, Goh, G, Htoon, H.M, Seah, X, Lwin, N.C, Liu, X, Chen, S, Liu, L, Mehta, J.S (2016). Evaluation of a Micro-Optical Coherence Tomography for the Corneal Endothelium in an Animal Model. Scientific Reports 6 : 29769. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29769
dc.identifier.issn2045-2322
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/182447
dc.description.abstractRecent developments in optical coherence tomography (OCT) systems for the cornea have limited resolution or acquisition speed. In this study we aim to evaluate the use of a 'micro-OCT' (?OCT ?1 ?m axial resolution) compared to existing imaging modalities using animal models of corneal endothelial disease. We used established cryoinjury and bullous keratopathy models in Sprague Dawley rats comparing ex vivo ?OCT imaging in normal and diseased eyes to (1) histology; (2) in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM); and (3) scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Qualitative and quantitative comparisons amongst imaging modalities were performed using mean endothelial cell circularity [(4? × Area)/Perimeter 2[ with coefficient of variation (COV). We found that ?OCT imaging was able to delineate endothelial cells (with nuclei), detect inflammatory cells, and corneal layers with histology-like resolution, comparable to existing imaging modalities. The mean endothelial cell circularity score was 0.88 ± 0.03, 0.87 ± 0.04 and 0.88 ± 0.05 (P = 0.216) for the SEM, IVCM and ?OCT respectively, with SEM producing homogenous endothelial cell images (COV = 0.028) compared to the IVCM (0.051) and ?OCT (0.062). In summary, our preliminary study suggests that the ?OCT may be useful for achieving non-contact, histology-like images of the cornea for endothelial cell evaluation, which requires further development for in vivo imaging.
dc.publisherNature Publishing Group
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceUnpaywall 20201031
dc.subjectanimal
dc.subjectconfocal microscopy
dc.subjectcornea disease
dc.subjectcornea endothelium
dc.subjectdiagnostic imaging
dc.subjectdisease model
dc.subjectevaluation study
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectoptical coherence tomography
dc.subjectprocedures
dc.subjectreproducibility
dc.subjectscanning electron microscopy
dc.subjectsensitivity and specificity
dc.subjectSprague Dawley rat
dc.subjectultrastructure
dc.subjectAnimals
dc.subjectCorneal Diseases
dc.subjectDisease Models, Animal
dc.subjectEndothelium, Corneal
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMicroscopy, Confocal
dc.subjectMicroscopy, Electron, Scanning
dc.subjectRats, Sprague-Dawley
dc.subjectReproducibility of Results
dc.subjectSensitivity and Specificity
dc.subjectTomography, Optical Coherence
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentDUKE-NUS MEDICAL SCHOOL
dc.description.doi10.1038/srep29769
dc.description.sourcetitleScientific Reports
dc.description.volume6
dc.description.page29769
dc.published.statepublished
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1038_srep29769.pdf2.72 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons