Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-S1-S12
Title: | Short clones or long clones? A simulation study on the use of paired reads in metagenomics | Authors: | Mitra, S Schubach, M Huson, D.H |
Keywords: | Analysis softwares Environmental sample Illumina Metagenomes Metagenomics Process sequencing Short reads Simulation studies Computer simulation Bioinformatics Cloning article computer program DNA sequence genetic database genome metagenomics methodology nucleotide sequence phylogeny sequence alignment Base Sequence Databases, Genetic Genome Metagenomics Phylogeny Sequence Alignment Sequence Analysis, DNA Software |
Issue Date: | 2010 | Citation: | Mitra, S, Schubach, M, Huson, D.H (2010). Short clones or long clones? A simulation study on the use of paired reads in metagenomics. BMC Bioinformatics 11 (SUPPLL.1) : S12. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-S1-S12 | Rights: | Attribution 4.0 International | Abstract: | Background: Metagenomics is the study of environmental samples using sequencing. Rapid advances in sequencing technology are fueling a vast increase in the number and scope of metagenomics projects. Most metagenome sequencing projects so far have been based on Sanger or Roche-454 sequencing, as only these technologies provide long enough reads, while Illumina sequencing has not been considered suitable for metagenomic studies due to a short read length of only 35 bp. However, now that reads of length 75 bp can be sequenced in pairs, Illumina sequencing has become a viable option for metagenome studies.Results: This paper addresses the problem of taxonomical analysis of paired reads. We describe a new feature of our metagenome analysis software MEGAN that allows one to process sequencing reads in pairs and makes assignments of such reads based on the combined bit scores of their matches to reference sequences. Using this new software in a simulation study, we investigate the use of Illumina paired-sequencing in taxonomical analysis and compare the performance of single reads, short clones and long clones. In addition, we also compare against simulated Roche-454 sequencing runs.Conclusion: This work shows that paired reads perform better than single reads, as expected, but also, perhaps slightly less obviously, that long clones allow more specific assignments than short ones. A new version of the program MEGAN that explicitly takes paired reads into account is available from our website. © 2010 Mitra et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. | Source Title: | BMC Bioinformatics | URI: | https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/181684 | ISSN: | 14712105 | DOI: | 10.1186/1471-2105-11-S1-S12 | Rights: | Attribution 4.0 International |
Appears in Collections: | Elements Staff Publications |
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | Access Settings | Version | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10_1186_1471-2105-11-S1-S12.pdf | 2.17 MB | Adobe PDF | OPEN | None | View/Download |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License