Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01157
Title: Effects of emotional experience in lexical decision
Authors: Siakaluk, P.D
Ian Newcombe, P
Duffels, B
Li, E
Sidhu, D.M
Yap, M.J 
Pexman, P.M
Issue Date: 2016
Citation: Siakaluk, P.D, Ian Newcombe, P, Duffels, B, Li, E, Sidhu, D.M, Yap, M.J, Pexman, P.M (2016). Effects of emotional experience in lexical decision. Frontiers in Psychology 7 (AUG) : 1157. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01157
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: Previous research has examined the effects of emotional experience (i.e., the ease with which words evoke emotion information) in semantic categorization (SCT), word naming, and Stroop tasks (Newcombe et al., 2012; Siakaluk et al., 2014; Moffat et al., 2015). However, to date there are no published reports on whether emotional experience influences performance in the lexical decision task (LDT). In the present study, we examined the influence of emotional experience in LDT using three different stimulus sets. In Experiment 1 we used a stimulus set used by both Kousta et al. (2009; Experiment 1) and Yap and Seow (2014) that is comprised of 40 negative, 40 positive, and 40 neutral words; in Experiment 2 we used a stimulus set comprised of 150 abstract nouns; and in Experiment 3 we used a stimulus set comprised of 373 verbs. We observed facilitatory effects of emotional experience in each of the three experiments, such that words with higher emotional experience ratings were associated with faster response latencies. These results are important because the influence of emotional experience: (a) is observed in stimulus sets comprised of different types of words, demonstrating the generalizability of the effect in LDT; (b) accounts for LDT response latency variability above and beyond the influences of valence and arousal, and is thus a robust dimension of conceptual knowledge; (c) suggests that a richer representation of emotional experience provides more reliable evidence that a stimulus is a word, which facilitates responding in LDT; and (d) is consistent with grounded cognition frameworks that propose that emotion information may be grounded in bodily experience with the world (Barsalou, 2003, 2009; Vigliocco et al., 2009). © 2016 Siakaluk, Newcombe, Duffels, Li, Sidhu, Yap and Pexman.
Source Title: Frontiers in Psychology
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/181348
ISSN: 16641078
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01157
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_3389_fpsyg_2016_01157.pdf314.99 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons