Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.4301
Title: Dose coverage of axillary level I-III areas during whole breast irradiation with simplified intensity modulated radiation therapy in early stage breast cancer patients
Authors: Zhang, L
Yang, Z.-Z
Chen, X.-X
Tuan, J 
Ma, J.-L
Mei, X
Yu, X.-L
Zhou, Z.-R
Shao, Z.-M
Liu, G.-Y
Guo, X.-M
Keywords: adult
aged
Article
breast cancer
cancer staging
comparative study
controlled study
dosimetry
female
field in field intensity modulated radiation therapy
human
human tissue
intensity modulated radiation therapy
major clinical study
partial mastectomy
radiation dose distribution
sentinel lymph node biopsy
simplified intensity modulated radiation therapy
tumor biopsy
adjuvant radiotherapy
adverse effects
Breast Neoplasms
lymph node dissection
lymph node metastasis
mastectomy
middle aged
pathology
procedures
radiation dose
treatment outcome
x-ray computed tomography
Adult
Aged
Breast Neoplasms
Female
Humans
Lymph Node Excision
Lymphatic Metastasis
Mastectomy
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Staging
Radiation Dosage
Radiotherapy, Adjuvant
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Treatment Outcome
Issue Date: 2015
Citation: Zhang, L, Yang, Z.-Z, Chen, X.-X, Tuan, J, Ma, J.-L, Mei, X, Yu, X.-L, Zhou, Z.-R, Shao, Z.-M, Liu, G.-Y, Guo, X.-M (2015). Dose coverage of axillary level I-III areas during whole breast irradiation with simplified intensity modulated radiation therapy in early stage breast cancer patients. Oncotarget 6 (20) : 18183-18191. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.4301
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: Purpose: This study was designed to evaluate the dose coverage of axillary areas during whole breast irradiation with simplified intensity modulated radiation therapy (s-IMRT) and field-in-field IMRT (for-IMRT) in early stage breast cancer patients. Methods: Sixty-one consecutive patients with breast-conserving surgery and sentinel lymph node biopsy were collected. Two plans were created for each patient: the s-IMRT and for-IMRT plan. Dosimetric parameters of axillary areas were compared. Results: The average of mean doses delivered to the axillary level I areas in s-IMRT and for-IMRT plan were 27.7Gy and 29.1Gy (p = 0.011), respectively. The average of V47.5Gy, V45Gy and V40Gy (percent volume receiving? 47.5Gy, 45Gy and 40Gy) of the axillary level I in s-IMRT plan was significantly lower than that in for-IMRT plan (p < 0.001). For for-IMRT plans, patients with upper tangential border to humeral head ?2cm, breast separation >19.3cm and body width >31.9cm had significantly higher mean dose in axillary level I area (p = 0.002, 0.007, 0.001, respectively). Conclusion: Compared with for-IMRT plan, the s-IMRT plan delivered lower dose to axillary level I area. For centers using s-IMRT technique, caution should be exercised when selecting to omit axillary lymph node dissection for patients with breast conserving surgery and limited positive SLNs.
Source Title: Oncotarget
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/180945
ISSN: 19492553
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.4301
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_18632_oncotarget_4301.pdf1.35 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons