Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-016-0006-3
Title: | Comparison of Circulating Tumour Cells and Circulating Cell-Free Epstein-Barr Virus DNA in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Undergoing Radiotherapy | Authors: | Vo, J.H Nei, W.L Hu, M Phyo, W.M Wang, F Fong, K.W Tan, T Soong, Y.L Cheah, S.L Sommat, K Low, H Ling, B Ng, J Tan, W.L Chan, K.S Oon, L Ying, J.Y Tan, M.-H |
Keywords: | EBV-encoded nuclear antigen 1 Epstein Barr virus antigen virus DNA adult aged blood carcinoma comparative study Epstein Barr virus female genetics human immunology male middle aged nasopharynx tumor pathology treatment outcome tumor embolism very elderly virology young adult Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Carcinoma DNA, Viral Epstein-Barr Virus Nuclear Antigens Female Herpesvirus 4, Human Humans Male Middle Aged Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms Neoplastic Cells, Circulating Treatment Outcome Young Adult |
Issue Date: | 2016 | Publisher: | Nature Publishing Group | Citation: | Vo, J.H, Nei, W.L, Hu, M, Phyo, W.M, Wang, F, Fong, K.W, Tan, T, Soong, Y.L, Cheah, S.L, Sommat, K, Low, H, Ling, B, Ng, J, Tan, W.L, Chan, K.S, Oon, L, Ying, J.Y, Tan, M.-H (2016). Comparison of Circulating Tumour Cells and Circulating Cell-Free Epstein-Barr Virus DNA in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Undergoing Radiotherapy. Scientific Reports 6 (1) : 13. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-016-0006-3 | Rights: | Attribution 4.0 International | Abstract: | Quantification of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is commonly used in clinical settings as a circulating biomarker in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), but there has been no comparison with circulating tumour cells (CTCs). Our study aims to compare the performance of CTC enumeration against EBV cfDNA quantitation through digital PCR (dPCR) and quantitative PCR. 74 plasma samples from 46 NPC patients at baseline and one month after radiotherapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy were analysed. CTCs were captured by microsieve technology and enumerated, while three different methods of EBV cfDNA quantification were applied, including an in-house qPCR assay for BamHI-W fragment, a CE-IVD qPCR assay (Sentosa ®) and a dPCR (Clarity™) assay for Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA1). EBV cfDNA quantitation by all workflows showed stronger correlation with clinical stage, radiological response and overall survival in comparison with CTC enumeration. The highest detection rate of EBV cfDNA in pre-Treatment samples was seen with the BamHI-W qPCR assay (89%), followed by EBNA1-dPCR (85%) and EBNA1-qPCR (67%) assays. Overall, we show that EBV cfDNA outperforms CTC enumeration in correlation with clinical outcomes of NPC patients undergoing treatment. Techniques such as dPCR and target selection of BamHI-W may improve sensitivity for EBV cfDNA detection. © 2017 The Author(s). | Source Title: | Scientific Reports | URI: | https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/179780 | ISSN: | 2045-2322 | DOI: | 10.1038/s41598-016-0006-3 | Rights: | Attribution 4.0 International |
Appears in Collections: | Elements Staff Publications |
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | Access Settings | Version | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10_1038_s41598-016-0006-3.pdf | 1.31 MB | Adobe PDF | OPEN | None | View/Download |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License