Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25638
Title: Diagnostic performance of T1 and T2 mapping to detect intramyocardial hemorrhage in reperfused ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients
Authors: Bulluck, H
Rosmini, S
Abdel-Gadir, A
Bhuva, A.N
Treibel, T.A
Fontana, M
Gonzalez-Lopez, E
Ramlall, M
Hamarneh, A
Sirker, A
Herrey, A.S
Manisty, C
Yellon, D.M
Moon, J.C
Hausenloy, D.J 
Keywords: adult
area under the curve
Article
bleeding
cardiovascular magnetic resonance
clinical article
controlled study
diagnostic accuracy
diagnostic test accuracy study
female
heart disease
human
intramyocardial hemorrhage
male
percutaneous coronary intervention
predictive value
primary percutaneous coronary intervention
priority journal
prospective study
quantitative analysis
receiver operating characteristic
sensitivity and specificity
ST segment elevation myocardial infarction
bleeding
complication
diagnostic imaging
heart
heart infarction
heart muscle reperfusion
middle aged
nuclear magnetic resonance imaging
procedures
reproducibility
Female
Heart
Hemorrhage
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Myocardial Infarction
Myocardial Reperfusion
Prospective Studies
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Issue Date: 2017
Publisher: John Wiley and Sons Inc.
Citation: Bulluck, H, Rosmini, S, Abdel-Gadir, A, Bhuva, A.N, Treibel, T.A, Fontana, M, Gonzalez-Lopez, E, Ramlall, M, Hamarneh, A, Sirker, A, Herrey, A.S, Manisty, C, Yellon, D.M, Moon, J.C, Hausenloy, D.J (2017). Diagnostic performance of T1 and T2 mapping to detect intramyocardial hemorrhage in reperfused ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 46 (3) : 877-886. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25638
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: Purpose: To investigate the performance of T1 and T2 mapping to detect intramyocardial hemorrhage (IMH) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). Materials and Methods: Fifty STEMI patients were prospectively recruited between August 2013 and July 2014 following informed consent. Forty-eight patients completed a 1.5T cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with native T1, T2, and T2* maps at 4 ± 2 days. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed to assess the performance of T1 and T2 to detect IMH. Results: The mean age was 59 ± 13 years old and 88% (24/48) were male. In all, 39 patients had interpretable T2* maps and 26/39 (67%) of the patients had IMH (T2* <20 msec on T2* maps). Both T1 and T2 values of the hypointense core within the area-at-risk (AAR) performed equally well to detect IMH (T1 maps AUC 0.86 [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72–0.99] versus T2 maps AUC 0.86 [95% CI 0.74–0.99]; P = 0.94). Using the binary assessment of presence or absence of a hypointense core on the maps, the diagnostic performance of T1 and T2 remained equally good (T1 AUC 0.87 [95% CI 0.73–1.00] versus T2 AUC 0.85 [95% CI 0.71–0.99]; P = 0.90) with good sensitivity and specificity (T1: 88% and 85% and T2: 85% and 85%, respectively). Conclusion: The presence of a hypointense core on the T1 and T2 maps can detect IMH equally well and with good sensitivity and specificity in reperfused STEMI patients and could be used as an alternative when T2* images are not acquired or are not interpretable. Level of Evidence: 2. Technical Efficacy: Stage 2. J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2017;46:877–886. © 2017 The Authors Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Source Title: Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/179098
ISSN: 10531807
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25638
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1002_jmri_25638.pdf460.08 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons