Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-7-9
Title: What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies
Authors: McDonald, A.M
Knight, R.C
Campbell, M.K
Entwistle, V.A 
Grant, A.M
Cook, J.A
Elbourne, D.R
Francis, D
Garcia, J
Roberts, I
Snowdon, C
Keywords: drug
chi square test
clinical research
clinical trial
cohort analysis
data analysis
data base
Fisher exact test
health care financing
health care organization
human
medical research
medical technology
randomization
review
United Kingdom
Issue Date: 2006
Publisher: BMC
Citation: McDonald, A.M, Knight, R.C, Campbell, M.K, Entwistle, V.A, Grant, A.M, Cook, J.A, Elbourne, D.R, Francis, D, Garcia, J, Roberts, I, Snowdon, C (2006). What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. Trials 7 : 9. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-7-9
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: Background: A commonly reported problem with the conduct of multicentre randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is that recruitment is often slower or more difficult than expected, with many trials failing to reach their planned sample size within the timescale and funding originally envisaged. The aim of this study was to explore factors that may have been associated with good and poor recruitment in a cohort of multicentre trials funded by two public bodies: the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) and the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Programme. Methods: The cohort of trials was identified from the administrative databases held by the two funding bodies. 114 trials that recruited participants between 1994 and 2002 met the inclusion criteria. The full scientific applications and subsequent trial reports submitted by the trial teams to the funders provided the principal data sources. Associations between trial characteristics and recruitment success were tested using the Chi-squared test, or Fisher's exact test where appropriate. Results: Less than a third (31%) of the trials achieved their original recruitment target and half (53%) were awarded an extension. The proportion achieving targets did not appear to improve over time. The overall start to recruitment was delayed in 47 (41%) trials and early recruitment problems were identified in 77 (63%) trials. The inter-relationship between trial features and recruitment success was complex. A variety of strategies were employed to try to increase recruitment, but their success could not be assessed. Conclusion: Recruitment problems are complex and challenging. Many of the trials in the cohort experienced recruitment difficulties. Trials often required extended recruitment periods (sometimes supported by additional funds). While this is of continuing concern, success in addressing the trial question may be more important than recruitment alone. © 2006 McDonald et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
Source Title: Trials
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/178363
ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-7-9
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1186_1745-6215-7-9.pdf367.39 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons