Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-7-9
DC FieldValue
dc.titleWhat influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies
dc.contributor.authorMcDonald, A.M
dc.contributor.authorKnight, R.C
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, M.K
dc.contributor.authorEntwistle, V.A
dc.contributor.authorGrant, A.M
dc.contributor.authorCook, J.A
dc.contributor.authorElbourne, D.R
dc.contributor.authorFrancis, D
dc.contributor.authorGarcia, J
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, I
dc.contributor.authorSnowdon, C
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-20T09:32:38Z
dc.date.available2020-10-20T09:32:38Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.citationMcDonald, A.M, Knight, R.C, Campbell, M.K, Entwistle, V.A, Grant, A.M, Cook, J.A, Elbourne, D.R, Francis, D, Garcia, J, Roberts, I, Snowdon, C (2006). What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. Trials 7 : 9. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-7-9
dc.identifier.issn1745-6215
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/178363
dc.description.abstractBackground: A commonly reported problem with the conduct of multicentre randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is that recruitment is often slower or more difficult than expected, with many trials failing to reach their planned sample size within the timescale and funding originally envisaged. The aim of this study was to explore factors that may have been associated with good and poor recruitment in a cohort of multicentre trials funded by two public bodies: the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) and the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Programme. Methods: The cohort of trials was identified from the administrative databases held by the two funding bodies. 114 trials that recruited participants between 1994 and 2002 met the inclusion criteria. The full scientific applications and subsequent trial reports submitted by the trial teams to the funders provided the principal data sources. Associations between trial characteristics and recruitment success were tested using the Chi-squared test, or Fisher's exact test where appropriate. Results: Less than a third (31%) of the trials achieved their original recruitment target and half (53%) were awarded an extension. The proportion achieving targets did not appear to improve over time. The overall start to recruitment was delayed in 47 (41%) trials and early recruitment problems were identified in 77 (63%) trials. The inter-relationship between trial features and recruitment success was complex. A variety of strategies were employed to try to increase recruitment, but their success could not be assessed. Conclusion: Recruitment problems are complex and challenging. Many of the trials in the cohort experienced recruitment difficulties. Trials often required extended recruitment periods (sometimes supported by additional funds). While this is of continuing concern, success in addressing the trial question may be more important than recruitment alone. © 2006 McDonald et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.publisherBMC
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceUnpaywall 20201031
dc.subjectdrug
dc.subjectchi square test
dc.subjectclinical research
dc.subjectclinical trial
dc.subjectcohort analysis
dc.subjectdata analysis
dc.subjectdata base
dc.subjectFisher exact test
dc.subjecthealth care financing
dc.subjecthealth care organization
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectmedical research
dc.subjectmedical technology
dc.subjectrandomization
dc.subjectreview
dc.subjectUnited Kingdom
dc.typeReview
dc.contributor.departmentDEAN'S OFFICE (MEDICINE)
dc.description.doi10.1186/1745-6215-7-9
dc.description.sourcetitleTrials
dc.description.volume7
dc.description.page9
dc.published.statepublished
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1186_1745-6215-7-9.pdf367.39 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons