Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-7-34
Title: Financial considerations in the conduct of multi-centre randomised controlled trials: Evidence from a qualitative study
Authors: Snowdon, C
Elbourne, D.R
Garcia, J
Campbell, M.K
Entwistle, V.A 
Francis, D
Grant, A.M
Knight, R.C
McDonald, A.M
Roberts, I
Keywords: antioxidant
beta adrenergic receptor stimulating agent
corticosteroid derivative
fluorouracil
hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor
hypocholesterolemic agent
irinotecan
leukotriene receptor blocking agent
oxaliplatin
placebo
simvastatin
vitamin
anorexia nervosa
article
asthma
cardiovascular disease
clinical research
clinical trial
colorectal cancer
cost benefit analysis
cost utility analysis
drug cost
financial management
funding
health care planning
human
ischemic heart disease
national health service
qualitative research
randomization
resource allocation
semi structured interview
snowball sample
telephone
United Kingdom
Issue Date: 2006
Publisher: BMC
Citation: Snowdon, C, Elbourne, D.R, Garcia, J, Campbell, M.K, Entwistle, V.A, Francis, D, Grant, A.M, Knight, R.C, McDonald, A.M, Roberts, I (2006). Financial considerations in the conduct of multi-centre randomised controlled trials: Evidence from a qualitative study. Trials 7 : 34. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-7-34
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: Background: Securing and managing finances for multicentre randomised controlled trials is a highly complex activity which is rarely considered in the research literature. This paper describes the process of financial negotiation and the impact of financial considerations in four UK multicentre trials. These trials had met, or were on schedule to meet, recruitment targets agreed with their public-sector funders. The trials were considered within a larger study examining factors which might be associated with trial recruitment (STEPS). Methods: In-depth semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted in 2003-04 with 45 individuals with various responsibilities to one of the four trials. Interviewees were recruited through purposive and then snowball sampling. Interview transcripts were analysed with the assistance of the qualitative package Atlas-ti. Results: The data suggest that the UK system of dividing funds into research, treatment and NHS support costs brought the trial teams into complicated negotiations with multiple funders. The divisions were somewhat malleable and the funding system was used differently in each trial. The fact that all funders had the potential to influence and shape the trials considered here was an important issue as the perspectives of applicants and funders could diverge. The extent and range of industry involvement in non-industry-led trials was striking. Three broad periods of financial work (foundation, maintenance, and resourcing completion) were identified. From development to completion of a trial, the trialists had to be resourceful and flexible, adapting to changing internal and external circumstances. In each period, trialists and collaborators could face changing costs and challenges. Each trial extended the recruitment period; three required funding extensions from MRC or HTA. Conclusion: This study highlights complex financial aspects of planning and conducting trials, especially where multiple funders are involved. Recognition of the importance of financial stability and of the need for appropriate training in this area should be paralleled by further similar research with a broader range of trials, aimed at understanding and facilitating the conduct of clinical research. © 2006 Snowdon et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
Source Title: Trials
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/178356
ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-7-34
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1186_1745-6215-7-34.pdf404.79 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons