Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-7-34
DC FieldValue
dc.titleFinancial considerations in the conduct of multi-centre randomised controlled trials: Evidence from a qualitative study
dc.contributor.authorSnowdon, C
dc.contributor.authorElbourne, D.R
dc.contributor.authorGarcia, J
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, M.K
dc.contributor.authorEntwistle, V.A
dc.contributor.authorFrancis, D
dc.contributor.authorGrant, A.M
dc.contributor.authorKnight, R.C
dc.contributor.authorMcDonald, A.M
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, I
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-20T09:31:05Z
dc.date.available2020-10-20T09:31:05Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.citationSnowdon, C, Elbourne, D.R, Garcia, J, Campbell, M.K, Entwistle, V.A, Francis, D, Grant, A.M, Knight, R.C, McDonald, A.M, Roberts, I (2006). Financial considerations in the conduct of multi-centre randomised controlled trials: Evidence from a qualitative study. Trials 7 : 34. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-7-34
dc.identifier.issn1745-6215
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/178356
dc.description.abstractBackground: Securing and managing finances for multicentre randomised controlled trials is a highly complex activity which is rarely considered in the research literature. This paper describes the process of financial negotiation and the impact of financial considerations in four UK multicentre trials. These trials had met, or were on schedule to meet, recruitment targets agreed with their public-sector funders. The trials were considered within a larger study examining factors which might be associated with trial recruitment (STEPS). Methods: In-depth semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted in 2003-04 with 45 individuals with various responsibilities to one of the four trials. Interviewees were recruited through purposive and then snowball sampling. Interview transcripts were analysed with the assistance of the qualitative package Atlas-ti. Results: The data suggest that the UK system of dividing funds into research, treatment and NHS support costs brought the trial teams into complicated negotiations with multiple funders. The divisions were somewhat malleable and the funding system was used differently in each trial. The fact that all funders had the potential to influence and shape the trials considered here was an important issue as the perspectives of applicants and funders could diverge. The extent and range of industry involvement in non-industry-led trials was striking. Three broad periods of financial work (foundation, maintenance, and resourcing completion) were identified. From development to completion of a trial, the trialists had to be resourceful and flexible, adapting to changing internal and external circumstances. In each period, trialists and collaborators could face changing costs and challenges. Each trial extended the recruitment period; three required funding extensions from MRC or HTA. Conclusion: This study highlights complex financial aspects of planning and conducting trials, especially where multiple funders are involved. Recognition of the importance of financial stability and of the need for appropriate training in this area should be paralleled by further similar research with a broader range of trials, aimed at understanding and facilitating the conduct of clinical research. © 2006 Snowdon et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.publisherBMC
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceUnpaywall 20201031
dc.subjectantioxidant
dc.subjectbeta adrenergic receptor stimulating agent
dc.subjectcorticosteroid derivative
dc.subjectfluorouracil
dc.subjecthydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor
dc.subjecthypocholesterolemic agent
dc.subjectirinotecan
dc.subjectleukotriene receptor blocking agent
dc.subjectoxaliplatin
dc.subjectplacebo
dc.subjectsimvastatin
dc.subjectvitamin
dc.subjectanorexia nervosa
dc.subjectarticle
dc.subjectasthma
dc.subjectcardiovascular disease
dc.subjectclinical research
dc.subjectclinical trial
dc.subjectcolorectal cancer
dc.subjectcost benefit analysis
dc.subjectcost utility analysis
dc.subjectdrug cost
dc.subjectfinancial management
dc.subjectfunding
dc.subjecthealth care planning
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectischemic heart disease
dc.subjectnational health service
dc.subjectqualitative research
dc.subjectrandomization
dc.subjectresource allocation
dc.subjectsemi structured interview
dc.subjectsnowball sample
dc.subjecttelephone
dc.subjectUnited Kingdom
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentDEAN'S OFFICE (MEDICINE)
dc.description.doi10.1186/1745-6215-7-34
dc.description.sourcetitleTrials
dc.description.volume7
dc.description.page34
dc.published.statepublished
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1186_1745-6215-7-34.pdf404.79 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons