Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10020188
Title: Macronutrient composition and food form affect glucose and insulin responses in humans
Authors: Shafaeizadeh, S
Muhardi, L
Henry, C.J 
van de Heijning, B.J.M
van der Beek, E.M
Keywords: Article
carbohydrate analysis
controlled study
crossover procedure
enzymatic assay
food industry
glucose blood level
glycemic index
human
insulin dependent diabetes mellitus
insulin response
macronutrient
non insulin dependent diabetes mellitus
physical activity
protein quality
randomized controlled trial
adult
analysis
area under the curve
beverage
blood
carbohydrate diet
clinical trial
comparative study
diet
digestion
drug therapy
elemental diet
female
glycemic index
hyperglycemia
hyperinsulinism
insulin resistance
meal
metabolism
nutritional value
postprandial state
reproducibility
young adult
biological marker
insulin
Adult
Area Under Curve
Beverages
Biomarkers
Blood Glucose
Breakfast
Cross-Over Studies
Diet
Dietary Carbohydrates
Digestion
Female
Food, Formulated
Glycemic Index
Humans
Hyperglycemia
Hyperinsulinism
Insulin
Insulin Resistance
Nutritive Value
Postprandial Period
Reproducibility of Results
Young Adult
Issue Date: 2018
Citation: Shafaeizadeh, S, Muhardi, L, Henry, C.J, van de Heijning, B.J.M, van der Beek, E.M (2018). Macronutrient composition and food form affect glucose and insulin responses in humans. Nutrients 10 (2) : 188. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10020188
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: Glycaemic index (GI) is used as an indicator to guide consumers in making healthier food choices. We compared the GI, insulin index (II), and the area under the curve for blood glucose and insulin as glucose (GR) and insulin responses (IR) of a newly developed liquid nutritional formula with one commercially available liquid product with different types of carbohydrates. We then evaluated the glucose and insulin responses of two test foods with comparable energy density and protein percentage but presented in different food forms (liquid vs. solid). Fourteen healthy women participated in the study. GI, II, GR, and IR were assessed after (independent) consumption of two liquid products and a solid breakfast meal. The two liquid foods showed comparable GI, whilst the liquid form appeared to produce lower median GI (25 vs. 54), and II (52 vs. 98) values compared to the solid breakfast (p < 0.02). The median GR and IR for solid breakfast were respectively 44% and 45% higher compared to the liquid product (p < 0.02). Liquid formulas with different carbohydrate qualities produced comparable glucose responses, while foods with comparable energy density and protein percentage but different food form elicited differential effects on GI, II, GR, and IR. Nutrient quality and food form need to be taken into consideration when developing low GI products to manage glycaemic responses. © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
Source Title: Nutrients
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/178260
ISSN: 20726643
DOI: 10.3390/nu10020188
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_3390_nu10020188.pdf536.92 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons