Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10030303
Title: Body fat measurements in Singaporean adults using four methods
Authors: Bi, X
Loo, Y.T
Henry, C.J 
Keywords: adult
age
aged
anthropometry
Article
bioelectrical impedance analysis
body composition
body fat
body mass
cross-sectional study
diagnostic procedure
dual energy X ray absorptiometry
female
gender
human
male
plethysmography
Singaporean
skinfold thickness
Asian continental ancestry group
comparative study
ethnology
impedance
middle aged
obesity
photon absorptiometry
predictive value
procedures
reproducibility
sex factor
Singapore
skinfold thickness
young adult
Absorptiometry, Photon
Adiposity
Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Asian Continental Ancestry Group
Cross-Sectional Studies
Electric Impedance
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Plethysmography
Predictive Value of Tests
Reproducibility of Results
Sex Factors
Singapore
Skinfold Thickness
Young Adult
Issue Date: 2018
Citation: Bi, X, Loo, Y.T, Henry, C.J (2018). Body fat measurements in Singaporean adults using four methods. Nutrients 10 (3) : 303. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10030303
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: Few studies have been conducted to measure body composition in Asian populations. In this study, we determined the percent body fat (PBF) by using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), air-displacement plethysmography (ADP or BOD POD), bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and skinfold (SKF) in 445 healthy Singaporean adults. We observed that the BOD POD, BIA and SKF estimates of PBF were highly correlated with that from DEXA (as a reference method) among Singaporean adults. However, they all underestimated PBF (differences of 3.9% for BOD POD, 5.6% for BIA and 12.5% for SKF). Our results filled a gap in the literature by testing the relationships between DEXA and BOD POD, BIA and SKF in a large sample with a wide range of body mass index (BMI) from 16.1 to 37.5 kg/m2 and age from 21 to 69.2 years. The differences of PBF measured by different methods were dependent on age, gender and ethnicity. No significant difference was observed between DEXA and BOD POD in men aged > 40 or in BMI tertile 3. However, the mean difference between DEXA and BOD POD was significant in women. Different measuring methods of estimating PBF therefore must be cautiously interpreted. © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
Source Title: Nutrients
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/178255
ISSN: 20726643
DOI: 10.3390/nu10030303
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_3390_nu10030303.pdf1.12 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons