Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Clinical and physiological effects of transcranial electrical stimulation position on motor evoked potentials in scoliosis surgery
Authors: Lo, Y.L 
Dan, Y.F
Tan, Y.E
Teo, A
Tan, S.B 
Yue, W.M 
Guo, C.M 
Fook-Chong, S
Issue Date: 2010
Publisher: BMC
Citation: Lo, Y.L, Dan, Y.F, Tan, Y.E, Teo, A, Tan, S.B, Yue, W.M, Guo, C.M, Fook-Chong, S (2010). Clinical and physiological effects of transcranial electrical stimulation position on motor evoked potentials in scoliosis surgery. Scoliosis 5 (1) : 3. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: Background: During intraoperative monitoring for scoliosis surgery, we have previously elicited ipsilateral and contralateral motor evoked potentials (MEP) with cross scalp stimulation. Ipsilateral MEPs, which may have comprised summation of early ipsilaterally conducted components and transcallosally or deep white matter stimulated components, can show larger amplitudes than those derived purely from contralateral motor cortex stimulation. We tested this hypothesis using two stimulating positions. We compared intraoperative MEPs in 14 neurologically normal subjects undergoing scoliosis surgery using total intravenous anesthetic regimens.Methods: Trancranial electrical stimulation was applied with both cross scalp (C3C4 or C4C3) or midline (C3Cz or C4Cz) positions. The latter was assumed to be more focal and result in little transcallosal/deep white matter stimulation. A train of 5 square wave stimuli 0.5 ms in duration at up to 200 mA was delivered with 4 ms (250 Hz) interstimulus intervals. Averaged supramaximal MEPs were obtained from the tibialis anterior bilaterally.Results: The cross scalp stimulating position resulted in supramaximal MEPs that were of significantly higher amplitude, shorter latency and required lower stimulating intensity to elicit overall (Wilcoxon Signed Rank test, p < 0.05 for all), as compared to the midline stimulating position. However, no significant differences were found for all 3 parameters comparing ipsilaterally and contralaterally recorded MEPs (p > 0.05 for all), seen for both stimulating positions individually.Conclusions: Our findings suggest that cross scalp stimulation resulted in MEPs obtained ipsilaterally and contralaterally which may be contributed to by summation of ipsilateral and simultaneous transcallosally or deep white matter conducted stimulation of the opposite motor cortex. Use of this stimulating position is advocated to elicit MEPs under operative circumstances where anesthetic agents may cause suppression of cortical and spinal excitability. Although less focal in nature, cross scalp stimulation would be most suitable for infratentorial or spinal surgery, in contrast to supratentorial neurosurgical procedures. © 2010 Lo et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
Source Title: Scoliosis
ISSN: 1748-7161
DOI: 10.1186/1748-7161-5-3
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1186_1748-7161-5-3.pdf452.04 kBAdobe PDF




checked on Jan 20, 2021

Page view(s)

checked on Jan 14, 2021

Google ScholarTM



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons