Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2091-7-6
Title: Farnesylation or geranylgeranylation? Efficient assays for testing protein prenylation in vitro and in vivo
Authors: Benetka, W
Koranda, M
Maurer-Stroh, S 
Pittner, F
Eisenhaber, F
Keywords: geranyltransferase
glutathione transferase
protein farnesyltransferase
RhoA guanine nucleotide binding protein
article
assay
in vitro study
in vivo study
myristylation
nonhuman
palmitoylation
prenylation
protein processing
rabbit
reticulocyte
technique
thin layer chromatography
Western blotting
Animals
Blotting, Western
Cells, Cultured
Chromatography, Thin Layer
GTP-Binding Proteins
Humans
Mice
Protein Prenylation
Protein Processing, Post-Translational
Proteins
Rabbits
Sensitivity and Specificity
Oryctolagus cuniculus
Issue Date: 2006
Citation: Benetka, W, Koranda, M, Maurer-Stroh, S, Pittner, F, Eisenhaber, F (2006). Farnesylation or geranylgeranylation? Efficient assays for testing protein prenylation in vitro and in vivo. BMC Biochemistry 7 : 6. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2091-7-6
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: Background: Available in vitro and in vivo methods for verifying protein substrates for posttranslational modifications via farnesylation or geranylgeranylation (for example, autoradiography with 3H-labeled anchor precursors) are time consuming (weeks/months), laborious and suffer from low sensitivity. Results: We describe a new technique for detecting prenyl anchors in N-terminally glutathione S-transferase (GST)-labeled constructs of target proteins expressed in vitro in rabbit reticulocyte lysate and incubated with 3H-labeled anchor precursors. Alternatively, hemagglutinin (HA)-labeled constructs expressed in vivo (in cell culture) can be used. For registration of the radioactive marker, we propose to use a thin layer chromatography (TLC) analyzer. As a control, the protein yield is tested by Western blotting with anti-GST- (or anti-HA-) antibodies on the same membrane that has been previously used for TLC-scanning. These protocols have been tested with Rap2A, v-Ki-Ras2 and RhoA (variant RhoA63L) including the necessary controls. We show directly that RasD2 is a farnesylation target. Conclusion: Savings in time for experimentation and the higher sensitivity for detecting 3H-labeled lipid anchors recommend the TLC-scanning method with purified GST- (or HA-) tagged target proteins as the method of choice for analyzing their prenylation capabilities in vitro and in vivo and, possibly, also for studying the myristoyl and palmitoyl posttranslational modifications. © 2006Benetka et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
Source Title: BMC Biochemistry
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/178022
ISSN: 14712091
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2091-7-6
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1186_1471-2091-7-6.pdf2.26 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons