Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0278-x
Title: Towards an international taxonomy of integrated primary care: A Delphi consensus approach Service organization, utilization, and delivery of care
Authors: Valentijn P.P.
Vrijhoef H.J.M. 
Ruwaard D.
Boesveld I.
Arends R.Y.
Bruijnzeels M.A.
Keywords: classification
Delphi study
human
integrated health care system
international cooperation
Netherlands
nonbiological model
organization and management
primary health care
procedures
Classification
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated
Delphi Technique
Humans
International Cooperation
Models, Organizational
Netherlands
Primary Health Care
Issue Date: 2015
Publisher: BioMed Central Ltd.
Citation: Valentijn P.P., Vrijhoef H.J.M., Ruwaard D., Boesveld I., Arends R.Y., Bruijnzeels M.A. (2015). Towards an international taxonomy of integrated primary care: A Delphi consensus approach Service organization, utilization, and delivery of care. BMC Family Practice 16 (1) : 64. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0278-x
Abstract: Background: Developing integrated service models in a primary care setting is considered an essential strategy for establishing a sustainable and affordable health care system. The Rainbow Model of Integrated Care (RMIC) describes the theoretical foundations of integrated primary care. The aim of this study is to refine the RMIC by developing a consensus-based taxonomy of key features. Methods: First, the appropriateness of previously identified key features was retested by conducting an international Delphi study that was built on the results of a previous national Delphi study. Second, categorisation of the features among the RMIC integrated care domains was assessed in a second international Delphi study. Finally, a taxonomy was constructed by the researchers based on the results of the three Delphi studies. Results: The final taxonomy consists of 21 key features distributed over eight integration domains which are organised into three main categories: scope (person-focused vs. population-based), type (clinical, professional, organisational and system) and enablers (functional vs. normative) of an integrated primary care service model. Conclusions: The taxonomy provides a crucial differentiation that clarifies and supports implementation, policy formulation and research regarding the organisation of integrated primary care. Further research is needed to develop instruments based on the taxonomy that can reveal the realm of integrated primary care in practice. © 2015 Valentijn et al.; licensee BioMed Central.
Source Title: BMC Family Practice
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/174272
ISSN: 14712296
DOI: 10.1186/s12875-015-0278-x
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1186_s12875-015-0278-x.pdf933.93 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

57
checked on Oct 14, 2021

Page view(s)

92
checked on Oct 14, 2021

Download(s)

2
checked on Oct 14, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.