Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0278-x
DC FieldValue
dc.titleTowards an international taxonomy of integrated primary care: A Delphi consensus approach Service organization, utilization, and delivery of care
dc.contributor.authorValentijn P.P.
dc.contributor.authorVrijhoef H.J.M.
dc.contributor.authorRuwaard D.
dc.contributor.authorBoesveld I.
dc.contributor.authorArends R.Y.
dc.contributor.authorBruijnzeels M.A.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-04T02:07:24Z
dc.date.available2020-09-04T02:07:24Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationValentijn P.P., Vrijhoef H.J.M., Ruwaard D., Boesveld I., Arends R.Y., Bruijnzeels M.A. (2015). Towards an international taxonomy of integrated primary care: A Delphi consensus approach Service organization, utilization, and delivery of care. BMC Family Practice 16 (1) : 64. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0278-x
dc.identifier.issn14712296
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/174272
dc.description.abstractBackground: Developing integrated service models in a primary care setting is considered an essential strategy for establishing a sustainable and affordable health care system. The Rainbow Model of Integrated Care (RMIC) describes the theoretical foundations of integrated primary care. The aim of this study is to refine the RMIC by developing a consensus-based taxonomy of key features. Methods: First, the appropriateness of previously identified key features was retested by conducting an international Delphi study that was built on the results of a previous national Delphi study. Second, categorisation of the features among the RMIC integrated care domains was assessed in a second international Delphi study. Finally, a taxonomy was constructed by the researchers based on the results of the three Delphi studies. Results: The final taxonomy consists of 21 key features distributed over eight integration domains which are organised into three main categories: scope (person-focused vs. population-based), type (clinical, professional, organisational and system) and enablers (functional vs. normative) of an integrated primary care service model. Conclusions: The taxonomy provides a crucial differentiation that clarifies and supports implementation, policy formulation and research regarding the organisation of integrated primary care. Further research is needed to develop instruments based on the taxonomy that can reveal the realm of integrated primary care in practice. © 2015 Valentijn et al.; licensee BioMed Central.
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd.
dc.sourceUnpaywall 20200831
dc.subjectclassification
dc.subjectDelphi study
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectintegrated health care system
dc.subjectinternational cooperation
dc.subjectNetherlands
dc.subjectnonbiological model
dc.subjectorganization and management
dc.subjectprimary health care
dc.subjectprocedures
dc.subjectClassification
dc.subjectDelivery of Health Care, Integrated
dc.subjectDelphi Technique
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectInternational Cooperation
dc.subjectModels, Organizational
dc.subjectNetherlands
dc.subjectPrimary Health Care
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentSAW SWEE HOCK SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
dc.description.doi10.1186/s12875-015-0278-x
dc.description.sourcetitleBMC Family Practice
dc.description.volume16
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.page64
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1186_s12875-015-0278-x.pdf933.93 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.