Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399720912548
Title: Does Participatory Budgeting Alter Public Spending? Evidence from New York City
Authors: Thad Calabrese
Dan Williams
Anubhav Gupta 
Keywords: deliberative democracy
direct democracy
earmarks
participatory budgeting
participatory democracy
Issue Date: 21-Apr-2020
Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc.
Citation: Thad Calabrese, Dan Williams, Anubhav Gupta (2020-04-21). Does Participatory Budgeting Alter Public Spending? Evidence from New York City. Administration and Society 52 (9) : 1382 - 1409. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399720912548
Abstract: Participatory budgeting is described as a direct-democracy approach to resource allocation decision making. Theories assume it changes how public resources are spent by moving decisions from elected officials to citizens. The literature does not consider how earmarking?in which legislators direct parts of public budgets directly?might affect the impact of such policy devices. New York City?s participatory budgeting process which uses earmarks is analyzed to determine spending changes. Officials involved fund more projects at lower average amounts than those not involved but do not change the areas of funding, all of which is expected in systems of budgetary earmarks controlled by legislators. ? The Author(s) 2020.
Source Title: Administration and Society
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/172932
ISSN: 953997
DOI: 10.1177/0095399720912548
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
Anubhav Gupta - Does Participatory Budgeting Alter Public Spending (ul0720).pdf331.16 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.