Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218729
Title: The impact of hypocrisy on opinion formation: A dynamic model
Authors: Gastner, Michael T 
Takacs, Karoly
Gulyas, Mate
Szvetelszky, Zsuzsanna
Oborny, Beata
Keywords: Science & Technology
Multidisciplinary Sciences
Science & Technology - Other Topics
SOCIAL DESIRABILITY BIAS
LOCAL CONVERGENCE
ATTITUDE-CHANGE
CONFORMITY
NORMS
JURY
DISENGAGEMENT
EXPLANATIONS
EXPRESSION
HUSBANDS
Issue Date: 26-Jun-2019
Publisher: PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
Citation: Gastner, Michael T, Takacs, Karoly, Gulyas, Mate, Szvetelszky, Zsuzsanna, Oborny, Beata (2019-06-26). The impact of hypocrisy on opinion formation: A dynamic model. PLOS ONE 14 (6). ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218729
Abstract: © 2019 Gastner et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Humans have a demonstrated tendency to copy or imitate the behavior and attitude of others and actively influence each other’s opinions. In plenty of empirical contexts, publicly revealed opinions are not necessarily in line with internal opinions, causing complex social influence dynamics. We study to what extent hypocrisy is sustained during opinion formation and how hidden opinions change the convergence to consensus in a group. We build and analyze a modified version of the voter model with hypocrisy in a complete graph with a neutral competition between two alternatives. We compare the process from various initial conditions, varying the proportions between the two opinions in the external (revealed) and internal (hidden) layer. According to our results, hypocrisy always prolongs the time needed for reaching a consensus. In a complete graph, this time span increases linearly with group size. We find that the group-level opinion emerges in two steps: (1) a fast and directional process, during which the number of the two kinds of hypocrites equalizes; and (2) a slower, random drift of opinions. During stage (2), the ratio of opinions in the external layer is approximately equal to the ratio in the internal layer; that is, the hidden opinions do not differ significantly from the revealed ones at the group level. We furthermore find that the initial abundances of opinions, but not the initial prevalence of hypocrisy, predicts the mean consensus time and determines the opinions’ probabilities of winning. These insights highlight the unimportance of hypocrisy in consensus formation under neutral conditions. Our results have important societal implications in relation to hidden voter preferences in polls and improve our understanding of opinion formation in a more realistic setting than that of conventional voter models.
Source Title: PLOS ONE
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/168526
ISSN: 1932-6203
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218729
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
The impact of hypocrisy on opinion formation A dynamic model.pdf2.3 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

PublishedView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.