Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193112
Title: Revisiting policy on chronic HCV treatment under the Thai Universal Health Coverage: An economic evaluation and budget impact analysis
Authors: Rattanavipapong W.
Anothaisintawee T.
Teerawattananon Y. 
Keywords: daclatasvir
ledipasvir
peginterferon alpha
ribavirin
sofosbuvir
antivirus agent
Article
budget
chronic hepatitis C
controlled study
cost benefit analysis
cost effectiveness analysis
cost utility analysis
drug cost
economic evaluation
health care cost
health care policy
health insurance
Hepatitis C virus genotype 3
Markov chain
quality adjusted life year
quality of life
tax
Thailand
budget
chronic hepatitis C
combination drug therapy
cost
economic model
economics
female
genetics
genotype
genotyping technique
human
insurance
male
Antiviral Agents
Budgets
Costs and Cost Analysis
Drug Therapy, Combination
Female
Genotype
Genotyping Techniques
Hepatitis C, Chronic
Humans
Male
Models, Economic
Universal Coverage
Issue Date: 2018
Publisher: Public Library of Science
Citation: Rattanavipapong W., Anothaisintawee T., Teerawattananon Y. (2018). Revisiting policy on chronic HCV treatment under the Thai Universal Health Coverage: An economic evaluation and budget impact analysis. PLoS ONE 13 (2) : e0193112. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193112
Abstract: Thailand is encountering challenges to introduce the high-cost sofosbuvir for chronic hepatitis C treatment as part of the Universal Health Care’s benefit package. This study was conducted in respond to policy demand from the Thai government to assess the value for money and budget impact of introducing sofosbuvir-based regimens in the tax-based health insurance scheme. The Markov model was constructed to assess costs and benefits of the four treatment options that include: (i) current practice–peginterferon alfa (PEG) and ribavirin (RBV) for 24 weeks in genotype 3 and 48 weeks for other genotypes; (ii) Sofosbuvir plus peginterferon alfa and ribavirin (SOF+PEG-RBV) for 12 weeks; (iii) Sofosbuvir and daclatasvir (SOF+DCV) for 12 weeks; (iv) Sofosbuvir and ledipasvir (SOF+LDV) for 12 weeks for non-3 genotypes and SOF+PEG-RBV for 12 weeks for genotype 3 infection. Given that policy options (ii) and (iii) are for pan-genotypic infection, the cost of genotype testing was applied only for policy options (i) and (iv). Results reveal that all sofosbuvir-based regimens had greater quality adjusted life years (QALY) gains compared with the current treatment, therefore associated with lower lifetime costs and more favourable health outcomes. Additionally, among the three regimens of sofosbuvir, SOF+PEG-RBV for genotype 3 and SOF+LDV for non-3 genotype are the most cost-effective treatment option with the threshold of 160,000 THB per QALY gained. The results of this study had been used in policy discussion which resulted in the recent inclusion of SOF+PEG-RBV for genotype 3 and SOF+LDV for non-3 genotype in the Thailand’s benefit package. © 2018 Rattanavipapong et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Source Title: PLoS ONE
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/165968
ISSN: 19326203
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193112
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1371_journal_pone_0193112.pdf2.17 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.