Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089055
Title: | Reverse zoonotic disease transmission (Zooanthroponosis): A systematic review of seldom-documented human biological threats to animals | Authors: | Messenger A.M. Barnes A.N. Gray G.C. |
Keywords: | animal disease Antarctica article bacterial infection bacterial virulence disease transmission fungal virulence habitat host pathogen interaction human-animal bond livestock mycosis nonhuman parasite virulence parasitosis risk assessment risk factor systematic review virus infection virus virulence wildlife zoonosis Animals Animals, Domestic Animals, Wild Communicable Diseases Humans Influenza A virus Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Zoonoses |
Issue Date: | 2014 | Publisher: | Public Library of Science | Citation: | Messenger A.M., Barnes A.N., Gray G.C. (2014). Reverse zoonotic disease transmission (Zooanthroponosis): A systematic review of seldom-documented human biological threats to animals. PLoS ONE 9 (2) : e89055. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089055 | Abstract: | Background: Research regarding zoonotic diseases often focuses on infectious diseases animals have given to humans. However, an increasing number of reports indicate that humans are transmitting pathogens to animals. Recent examples include methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, influenza A virus, Cryptosporidium parvum, and Ascaris lumbricoides. The aim of this review was to provide an overview of published literature regarding reverse zoonoses and highlight the need for future work in this area. Methods: An initial broad literature review yielded 4763 titles, of which 4704 were excluded as not meeting inclusion criteria. After careful screening, 56 articles (from 56 countries over three decades) with documented human-to-animal disease transmission were included in this report. Findings: In these publications, 21 (38%) pathogens studied were bacterial, 16 (29%) were viral, 12 (21%) were parasitic, and 7 (13%) were fungal, other, or involved multiple pathogens. Effected animals included wildlife (n = 28, 50%), livestock (n = 24, 43%), companion animals (n = 13, 23%), and various other animals or animals not explicitly mentioned (n = 2, 4%). Published reports of reverse zoonoses transmission occurred in every continent except Antarctica therefore indicating a worldwide disease threat. Interpretation: As we see a global increase in industrial animal production, the rapid movement of humans and animals, and the habitats of humans and wild animals intertwining with great complexity, the future promises more opportunities for humans to cause reverse zoonoses. Scientific research must be conducted in this area to provide a richer understanding of emerging and reemerging disease threats. As a result, multidisciplinary approaches such as One Health will be needed to mitigate these problems. © 2014 Messenger et al. | Source Title: | PLoS ONE | URI: | https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/165955 | ISSN: | 19326203 | DOI: | 10.1371/journal.pone.0089055 |
Appears in Collections: | Staff Publications Elements |
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | Access Settings | Version | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10_1371_journal_pone_0089055.pdf | 925.82 kB | Adobe PDF | OPEN | None | View/Download |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.