Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096684
Title: | Assessing the accuracy and feasibility of a refractive error screening program conducted by school teachers in pre-primary and primary schools in Thailand | Authors: | Teerawattananon K. Myint C.-Y. Wongkittirux K. Teerawattananon Y. Chinkulkitnivat B. Orprayoon S. Kusakul S. Tengtrisorn S. Jenchitr W. |
Keywords: | amblyopia article child controlled study cross-sectional study delayed diagnosis descriptive research diagnostic accuracy diagnostic error diagnostic test accuracy study disease severity eye examination female human major clinical study male preschool child primary school program feasibility refraction error refractive error screening program school child screening sensitivity and specificity teacher Thailand visual acuity visual impairment comparative study mass screening procedures Refractive Errors school school health service student university vision test Vision, Low Child Child, Preschool Cross-Sectional Studies Faculty Female Humans Male Mass Screening Refractive Errors School Health Services Schools Students Thailand Vision Screening Vision, Low |
Issue Date: | 2014 | Publisher: | Public Library of Science | Citation: | Teerawattananon K., Myint C.-Y., Wongkittirux K., Teerawattananon Y., Chinkulkitnivat B., Orprayoon S., Kusakul S., Tengtrisorn S., Jenchitr W. (2014). Assessing the accuracy and feasibility of a refractive error screening program conducted by school teachers in pre-primary and primary schools in Thailand. PLoS ONE 9 (6) : e96684. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096684 | Abstract: | Introduction: As part of the development of a system for the screening of refractive error in Thai children, this study describes the accuracy and feasibility of establishing a program conducted by teachers. Objective: To assess the accuracy and feasibility of screening by teachers. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive and analytical study was conducted in 17 schools in four provinces representing four geographic regions in Thailand. A two-staged cluster sampling was employed to compare the detection rate of refractive error among eligible students between trained teachers and health professionals. Serial focus group discussions were held for teachers and parents in order to understand their attitude towards refractive error screening at schools and the potential success factors and barriers. Results: The detection rate of refractive error screening by teachers among pre-primary school children is relatively low (21%) for mild visual impairment but higher for moderate visual impairment (44%). The detection rate for primary school children is high for both levels of visual impairment (52% for mild and 74% for moderate). The focus group discussions reveal that both teachers and parents would benefit from further education regarding refractive errors and that the vast majority of teachers are willing to conduct a school-based screening program. Conclusion: Refractive error screening by health professionals in pre-primary and primary school children is not currently implemented in Thailand due to resource limitations. However, evidence suggests that a refractive error screening program conducted in schools by teachers in the country is reasonable and feasible because the detection and treatment of refractive error in very young generations is important and the screening program can be implemented and conducted with relatively low costs. © 2014 Teerawattananon et al. | Source Title: | PLoS ONE | URI: | https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/165711 | ISSN: | 19326203 | DOI: | 10.1371/journal.pone.0096684 |
Appears in Collections: | Staff Publications Elements |
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | Access Settings | Version | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10_1371_journal_pone_0096684.pdf | 505.49 kB | Adobe PDF | OPEN | Published | View/Download |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.