Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030333
Title: Systematic review of economic evaluations of preparedness strategies and interventions against influenza pandemics
Authors: Velasco R.P.
Praditsitthikorn N.
Wichmann K.
Mohara A.
Kotirum S.
Tantivess S.
Vallenas C.
Harmanci H.
Teerawattananon Y. 
Keywords: control strategy
cost control
cost effectiveness analysis
economic evaluation
health care cost
human
infection control
infection prevention
influenza vaccination
pandemic influenza
practice guideline
review
systematic review
cost benefit analysis
disaster planning
economics
infectious disease medicine
influenza
Influenza virus A H1N1
information processing
metabolism
methodology
pandemic
public health
statistical analysis
statistical model
Communicable Disease Control
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Data Collection
Data Interpretation, Statistical
Disaster Planning
Humans
Infectious Disease Medicine
Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype
Influenza, Human
Models, Economic
Pandemics
Public Health
Issue Date: 2012
Publisher: Public Library of Science
Citation: Velasco R.P., Praditsitthikorn N., Wichmann K., Mohara A., Kotirum S., Tantivess S., Vallenas C., Harmanci H., Teerawattananon Y. (2012). Systematic review of economic evaluations of preparedness strategies and interventions against influenza pandemics. PLoS ONE 7 (2) : e30333. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030333
Abstract: Background: Although public health guidelines have implications for resource allocation, these issues were not explicitly considered in previous WHO pandemic preparedness and response guidance. In order to ensure a thorough and informed revision of this guidance following the H1N1 2009 pandemic, a systematic review of published and unpublished economic evaluations of preparedness strategies and interventions against influenza pandemics was conducted. Methods: The search was performed in September 2011 using 10 electronic databases, 2 internet search engines, reference list screening, cited reference searching, and direct communication with relevant authors. Full and partial economic evaluations considering both costs and outcomes were included. Conversely, reviews, editorials, and studies on economic impact or complications were excluded. Studies were selected by 2 independent reviewers. Results: 44 studies were included. Although most complied with the cost effectiveness guidelines, the quality of evidence was limited. However, the data sources used were of higher quality in economic evaluations conducted after the 2009 H1N1 pandemic. Vaccination and drug regimens were varied. Pharmaceutical plus non-pharmaceutical interventions are relatively cost effective in comparison to vaccines and/or antivirals alone. Pharmaceutical interventions vary from cost saving to high cost effectiveness ratios. According to ceiling thresholds (Gross National Income per capita), the reduction of non-essential contacts and the use of pharmaceutical prophylaxis plus the closure of schools are amongst the cost effective strategies for all countries. However, quarantine for household contacts is not cost effective even for low and middle income countries. Conclusion: The available evidence is generally inconclusive regarding the cost effectiveness of preparedness strategies and interventions against influenza pandemics. Studies on their effectiveness and cost effectiveness should be readily implemented in forthcoming events that also involve the developing world. Guidelines for assessing the impact of disease and interventions should be drawn up to facilitate these studies. © 2012 World Health Organization; licensee Public Library of Science (PLoS).
Source Title: PLoS ONE
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/165577
ISSN: 19326203
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030333
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1371_journal_pone_0030333.pdf389.16 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.